Summary: | DAHLIN-00128: Asterisk not sending CNAM properly in PRI Facility IE data | ||
Reporter: | Ernie Dunbar (ernied) | Labels: | |
Date Opened: | 2009-07-21 12:08:45 | Date Closed: | 2012-04-03 17:25:28 |
Priority: | Minor | Regression? | No |
Status: | Closed/Complete | Components: | dahdi (the module) |
Versions: | 2.1.0.3 | Frequency of Occurrence | |
Related Issues: | |||
Environment: | Attachments: | ( 0) PRI_calltrap.txt | |
Description: | We informed our PRI provider that outgoing callerid doesn't include CNAM information, but does include CNUM. They did a calltrap (attached) and their results are that Asterisk sends the CNAM using the "Display" information element in the Standard Facility IE information. We're pretty sure we've done all we can with our DAHDI configuration, as chan_dahdi.conf uses "switchtype=5ess", "signalling=pri_cpe", and "facilityenable=yes", plus our calls to the PRI actually work with only this minor issue. Searching issues.asterisk.org for similar issues with Standard Facility IE produces results that say this issue is already fixed, but this may be a problem specific to our PRI provider (Group Telecom, now owned by Bell Canada) or our PRI switchtype. ****** ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ****** We have: Gentoo Linux 2008.0 (kernel 2.6.27-gentoo-r7) Asterisk 1.4.23.1 (newer versions crash on our system!) Dahdi-linux 2.1.0.3 Dahdi-tools 2.1.0.2 libpri-1.4.9 Our PRI provider (Group Telecom/Bell Canada) has: Lucent 5ess switch Using ESF, B8ZS PRI type is NI2 Our chan_dahdi.conf is: [channels] usecallerid=yes facilityenable=yes hidecallerid=no callwaitingcallerid=yes callwaiting=no threewaycalling=yes transfer=yes echocancel=yes echocancelwhenbridged=no immediate=no group=1 signalling=pri_cpe ;switchtype=national switchtype=5ess context=local channel=>1-23 rxgain=0 txgain=0 busydetect=yes busycount=5 | ||
Comments: | By: Shaun Ruffell (sruffell) 2012-04-03 17:25:28.254-0500 Closing this old issue. Please reopen if you still have this problem with current versions of libpri. This is most likely an issue in libpri anyway, and not in dahdi-linux. |