[Home]

Summary:ASTERISK-17227: No RTP port update when SIP RE-INVITE is received
Reporter:kondik (kondik)Labels:
Date Opened:2011-01-11 16:10:15.000-0600Date Closed:2011-06-07 14:00:53
Priority:MajorRegression?No
Status:Closed/CompleteComponents:Channels/chan_sip/General
Versions:Frequency of
Occurrence
Related
Issues:
Environment:Attachments:
Description:Exactly the same issue as: https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=15149 but those issue is closed, so I open new issue.

When RE-INVITE comes to asterisk with new media port, asterisk sends 200 OK, and send RTP packets further to the old port instead of new port which received with RE-INVITE.

My asterisk version is: 1.6.2.15

Could you help me with this?
Comments:By: Leif Madsen (lmadsen) 2011-01-12 08:53:04.000-0600

You need to provide debugging information. At a minimum:

* SIP trace from Asterisk
* SIP history
* Topology description
* Dialplan and scenario to reproduce issue
* End points involved (types of phones, PBXs, etc)
By: kondik (kondik) 2011-01-19 03:53:12.000-0600

The problem was solved.

RE-INVITE with SDP which comes to Asterisk had unsupported version for Asterisk, therefore asterisk ignore changes in SDP. However Asterisk send 200 OK for that RE-INVITE.
I think that in this situation asterisk should send another response than 200 OK...

Below the part of debug information:
[Jan 12 14:26:29] DEBUG[28322]: chan_sip.c:21891 handle_incoming: **** Received INVITE (5) - Command in SIP INVITE
[Jan 12 14:26:29] DEBUG[28322]: chan_sip.c:8334 process_sdp: Processing session-level SDP v=0... UNSUPPORTED.
[Jan 12 14:26:29] DEBUG[28322]: chan_sip.c:8821 process_sdp_o: Call 1eff4d503277e3ee1d7e353e3a443759@172.18.134.4 responded to our reinvite without changing SDP version; ignoring SDP.


When I set ignoresdpversion=on in configuration then Asterisk changed RTP port properly.


By: David Woolley (davidw) 2011-01-19 06:23:54.000-0600

It is a perfectly legitimate thing for a UAC to do!  200 is the correct response.  The problems lies with the client, if it is making changes to the SDP without updating the SDP version.