Summary:ASTERISK-16666: [patch] Negative filter values
Reporter:Tilghman Lesher (tilghman)Labels:
Date Opened:2010-09-11 01:14:55Date Closed:2010-12-31 03:29:12.000-0600
Versions:Frequency of
Environment:Attachments:( 0) 20100911__for_blitzrage.diff.txt
Description:[07:16:14]  leifmadsen (~Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) has joined channel #asterisk
[07:16:14]  Mode change "+o leifmadsen" on channel #asterisk by ChanServ
[07:16:49] <leifmadsen> Corydon76-dig: so I have a suggestion for cdr_adaptive_odbc
[07:18:53]  Signoff: infobot (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
[07:18:56] <leifmadsen> Corydon76-dig: a negating filter would be useful. For example, if I have two connections [my_log] and [my_filtered_log], and in [my_filtered_log] I had:  filter src => 0000FFFF0008 followed by static "DoNoCharge" => accountcode, I obviously am going to get a duplicate record (as the documentation states, and which is confirmed by testing). If on the [my_log] I could do something like:  filter !src => 0000FFFF0008  then I
[07:18:56] <leifmadsen> would not get duplicate records.
[07:19:01]  Signoff: JAMMAN2110 (Remote host closed the connection)
[07:21:16] <russellb> could follow the same method used in manager.conf, where you can specify blacklist or whitelist (or a combination of both) regular expressions
Comments:By: Leif Madsen (lmadsen) 2010-09-13 11:03:03

I will try and test this today!

By: Digium Subversion (svnbot) 2010-12-31 03:29:12.000-0600

Repository: asterisk
Revision: 300045

U   trunk/CHANGES
U   trunk/cdr/cdr_adaptive_odbc.c
U   trunk/configs/cdr_adaptive_odbc.conf.sample

r300045 | tilghman | 2010-12-31 03:29:11 -0600 (Fri, 31 Dec 2010) | 8 lines

Support negative filters.

(closes issue ASTERISK-16666)
Reported by: tilghman
      20100911__for_blitzrage.diff.txt uploaded by tilghman (license 14)
Tested by: lmadsen