|Summary:||ASTERISK-15355: [patch] port in users.conf is not honored in the register statement|
|Reporter:||Johann Steinwendtner (steinwej)||Labels:|
|Date Opened:||2009-12-22 14:14:32.000-0600||Date Closed:||2011-06-07 14:08:17|
|Environment:||Attachments:||( 0) users_port.diff|
|Description:||VoIP provider has SIP port set to 9060|
The account for the provider is defined in users.conf as follows:
context = DID_test
host = voipprovider.com
port = 9060
username = testuser
fromuser = testuser
secret = verysecret
insecure = no
trunkname = tname
hasiax = no
registeriax = no
hassip = yes
registersip = yes
trunkstyle = voip
hasexten = no
disallow = all
allow = alaw,gsm,adpcm
it is expected that the account testuser registers at voipprovider.com. But registration fails because * send the REGISTER to the default SIP port 5060
|Comments:||By: David Woolley (davidw) 2009-12-23 06:12:09.000-0600|
Does this change also affect sip.conf, as there is documentation in sip.conf.sample about port not working when specified in the device section, rather than a register line, which may need amending.
By: Johann Steinwendtner (steinwej) 2009-12-23 07:06:25.000-0600
No, this does only apply to devices loaded from users.conf.
By: David Woolley (davidw) 2009-12-23 07:54:07.000-0600
I assume you meant sip.conf, just then.
By: Johann Steinwendtner (steinwej) 2010-01-01 13:14:07.000-0600
ahm, no I meant users.conf. Maybe I have misunderstood your question. The patch appends the port to the host where the register is sent to.
By: Leif Madsen (lmadsen) 2010-01-04 10:11:45.000-0600
Does the users.conf.sample file show an example of the usage of 'port'?
By: Johann Steinwendtner (steinwej) 2010-01-04 10:19:04.000-0600
No, as per trunk, there is no example of the usage of 'port'.
By: Leif Madsen (lmadsen) 2010-01-04 14:23:24.000-0600
Is this adding a new feature then, or is this fixing an existing, undocumented feature?
Regardless, the patch should also include the changes to the users.conf.sample file as well.
By: Johann Steinwendtner (steinwej) 2010-01-08 10:03:46.000-0600
Well, then it would be a new feature. I will try.
By: Leif Madsen (lmadsen) 2010-03-23 09:51:46
Suspending this issue due to a lack of response from the reporter. If the reporter is interested in moving this issue forward, then please reopen the issue and provide the requested information. Thanks!