Summary: | ASTERISK-14612: ? in register= string breaks registration | ||
Reporter: | test011 (test011) | Labels: | |
Date Opened: | 2009-08-07 00:42:05 | Date Closed: | 2010-01-22 18:42:16.000-0600 |
Priority: | Minor | Regression? | Yes |
Status: | Closed/Complete | Components: | Channels/chan_sip/Registration |
Versions: | Frequency of Occurrence | ||
Related Issues: | |||
Environment: | Attachments: | ( 0) backtrace.txt | |
Description: | If you put '?' (w/o quotation) in register= string in sip.conf, asterisk does not parse it properly. One of my register= string has '?' in its password section, and asterisk can't parse it properly. This does not affect other lines in sip.conf The string I used is as bellow, register =>xxx@xxx.com:abc!5j5?!9!:xxx@hostip/123 Does '?' have been used as some token? Maybe I did not get that. I am pretty sure I haven't seen it in change.log or sip.conf.sample. The registration strings have worked fine with version 1.4.2, 1.6.0, and 1.6.1.0. | ||
Comments: | By: test011 (test011) 2009-08-07 00:51:13 WARNING[1081]: chan_sip.c:10986 transmit_register: Could not find peer xxx@xxx.com:abc!5j5 in transmit_register. Notice the password is chopped at '?' of abc!5j5?!9! By: Tilghman Lesher (tilghman) 2009-08-07 12:54:27 The patch on ASTERISK-14045 will fix this for you, although by changing the format slightly. That patch will allow you to quote nearly any field (exception of transport and portnum, which don't allow arbitrary characters, anyway) to prevent characters within from being interpreted as delimiters. By: Leif Madsen (lmadsen) 2009-08-07 15:09:00 I seem to be getting a segfault on the latest patch. By: Leif Madsen (lmadsen) 2009-08-07 15:09:26 Oops! Wrong issue -- this is the backtrace I get when testing 15008. Sorry :( By: test011 (test011) 2009-08-08 06:24:44 lmadsen, so the patch is ok? By: test011 (test011) 2009-08-08 11:06:19 I guess this isn't the place to leave a memo like this. However... ex) register => [peername?][transport://]user[@domain][:secret[:authuser]]@host[:port][/extension][~expiry] The new register format has some mysterious section called [peername?]. Not sure why this is necessary. I thought you can put that in 'host' section. The fix may be a long-term solution, since secret section may contain anything, but for the time-being you can go back to 1.6.1 branch or just add a 'peername?' (actual name of the peer w/o quote) in front of the string, like this; register =>peerORcontextname?xxx@xxx.com:abc!5j5?!9!:xxx@hostip/123 If you don't use a corresponding peer, I guess you need to apply the fix. By: Tilghman Lesher (tilghman) 2009-08-09 01:51:18 The purpose of the peer section is to get Asterisk to use a specific outgoing proxy for the registration request. The purpose of the patch is to allow you to quote any field, such that you can use characters in those fields that would otherwise be parsed as delimiters. By: Leif Madsen (lmadsen) 2009-08-18 15:14:09 Latest patch in 15008 seems to be working for me! By: Digium Subversion (svnbot) 2009-08-19 16:05:50 Repository: asterisk Revision: 213098 U trunk/channels/chan_sip.c U trunk/configs/sip.conf.sample ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r213098 | tilghman | 2009-08-19 16:05:48 -0500 (Wed, 19 Aug 2009) | 9 lines Better parsing for the "register" line Allows characters that are otherwise used as delimiters to be used within certain fields (like the secret). (closes issue ASTERISK-14045, closes issue ASTERISK-14612) Reported by: tilghman Patches: 20090818__issue15008.diff.txt uploaded by tilghman (license 14) Tested by: lmadsen, tilghman ------------------------------------------------------------------------ http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk?view=rev&revision=213098 By: Digium Subversion (svnbot) 2009-08-19 16:22:37 Repository: asterisk Revision: 213117 _U branches/1.6.2/ U branches/1.6.2/channels/chan_sip.c U branches/1.6.2/configs/sip.conf.sample ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r213117 | tilghman | 2009-08-19 16:22:36 -0500 (Wed, 19 Aug 2009) | 16 lines Merged revisions 213098 via svnmerge from https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk ........ r213098 | tilghman | 2009-08-19 16:05:17 -0500 (Wed, 19 Aug 2009) | 9 lines Better parsing for the "register" line Allows characters that are otherwise used as delimiters to be used within certain fields (like the secret). (closes issue ASTERISK-14045, closes issue ASTERISK-14612) Reported by: tilghman Patches: 20090818__issue15008.diff.txt uploaded by tilghman (license 14) Tested by: lmadsen, tilghman ........ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk?view=rev&revision=213117 By: Digium Subversion (svnbot) 2009-08-21 16:03:24 Repository: asterisk Revision: 213635 U trunk/channels/chan_sip.c ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r213635 | dvossel | 2009-08-21 16:03:23 -0500 (Fri, 21 Aug 2009) | 5 lines fixes sip register parsing when user@domain is used (issue ASTERISK-14045) (issue ASTERISK-14612) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk?view=rev&revision=213635 By: Digium Subversion (svnbot) 2009-08-21 16:12:48 Repository: asterisk Revision: 213636 _U branches/1.6.2/ U branches/1.6.2/channels/chan_sip.c ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r213636 | dvossel | 2009-08-21 16:12:47 -0500 (Fri, 21 Aug 2009) | 12 lines Merged revisions 213635 via svnmerge from https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk ........ r213635 | dvossel | 2009-08-21 16:02:50 -0500 (Fri, 21 Aug 2009) | 5 lines fixes sip register parsing when user@domain is used (issue ASTERISK-14045) (issue ASTERISK-14612) ........ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk?view=rev&revision=213636 By: Digium Subversion (svnbot) 2010-01-22 18:42:15.000-0600 Repository: asterisk Revision: 242514 _U branches/1.6.0/ U branches/1.6.0/channels/chan_sip.c U branches/1.6.0/configs/sip.conf.sample ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r242514 | tilghman | 2010-01-22 18:42:09 -0600 (Fri, 22 Jan 2010) | 55 lines Backporting register line parsing from trunk to fix a bad parsing error in 1.6.0. (closes issue ASTERISK-15182) Reported by: jamicque Patches: 20100114__issue16491.diff.txt uploaded by tilghman (license 14) Tested by: jamicque ........ r213098 | tilghman | 2009-08-19 16:05:17 -0500 (Wed, 19 Aug 2009) | 9 lines Better parsing for the "register" line Allows characters that are otherwise used as delimiters to be used within certain fields (like the secret). (closes issue ASTERISK-14045, closes issue ASTERISK-14612) Reported by: tilghman Patches: 20090818__issue15008.diff.txt uploaded by tilghman (license 14) Tested by: lmadsen, tilghman ........ r213635 | dvossel | 2009-08-21 16:02:50 -0500 (Fri, 21 Aug 2009) | 5 lines fixes sip register parsing when user@domain is used (issue ASTERISK-14045) (issue ASTERISK-14612) ........ r215222 | tilghman | 2009-09-01 16:19:40 -0500 (Tue, 01 Sep 2009) | 3 lines Fix register such that lines with a transport string, but without an authuser, parse correctly. (AST-228) ........ r215801 | tilghman | 2009-09-02 22:43:51 -0500 (Wed, 02 Sep 2009) | 5 lines Default the callback extension to "s". This is a regression. (closes issue ASTERISK-14697) Reported by: elguero Change-type: bugfix ........ r235132 | dvossel | 2009-12-15 12:43:06 -0600 (Tue, 15 Dec 2009) | 14 lines reverse minor sip registration regression A registration regression caused by a code tweak in (issue ASTERISK-13448) and a bug fix in (issue ASTERISK-14501) caused some sip registration config entries to be constructed incorrectly. Origially issue ASTERISK-13448 contained the code tweak as well as a bug fix, but since the issue was reported as a tweak the bug fix portion was moved into issue ASTERISK-14501. Both the tweak and the bug fix contained minor incorrect logic that resulted in some SIP registrations to fail. (issue ASTERISK-13448) (issue ASTERISK-14501) ........ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk?view=rev&revision=242514 |