Summary:	ASTERISK-14452: 183 response although progressinband=never
Reporter:	Richard Mudgett (rmudgett)	Labels:
Date Opened:	2009-07-10 09:57:03	Date Closed:	2009-07-15 17:05:51
Priority:	Minor	Regression?	No
Status:	Closed/Complete	Components:	Channels/chan_dahdi
Versions:		Frequency of Occurrence
Related Issues:
Environment:		Attachments:
Description:	See original issue 0013034 and related issue 15420. Due to recent restructuring of chan_dahdi extracting PRI signaling into sig_pri.c this appears to have broken the original issue fix.
Comments:	By: Digium Subversion (svnbot) 2009-07-15 17:02:56 Repository: asterisk Revision: 206767 U   trunk/channels/chan_dahdi.c U   trunk/channels/sig_analog.c U   trunk/channels/sig_analog.h U   trunk/channels/sig_pri.c U   trunk/channels/sig_pri.h ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r206767 | jpeeler | 2009-07-15 17:02:56 -0500 (Wed, 15 Jul 2009) | 10 lines The dialing flag was mistakingly removed from sig_pri. This readds the proper setting of the flag and is really a continuation of r205731. The flag was being set properly in sig_analog, but use of the newly added set_dialing callback allowed for some simplification in chan_dahdi. (closes issue ASTERISK-14452) Reported by: rmudgett ------------------------------------------------------------------------ http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk?view=rev&revision=206767 By: Digium Subversion (svnbot) 2009-07-15 17:04:44 Repository: asterisk Revision: 206769 _U  branches/1.6.0/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r206769 | jpeeler | 2009-07-15 17:04:44 -0500 (Wed, 15 Jul 2009) | 16 lines Blocked revisions 206767 via svnmerge ........  r206767 | jpeeler | 2009-07-15 17:02:55 -0500 (Wed, 15 Jul 2009) | 10 lines    The dialing flag was mistakingly removed from sig_pri.    This readds the proper setting of the flag and is really a continuation of  r205731. The flag was being set properly in sig_analog, but use of the  newly added set_dialing callback allowed for some simplification in  chan_dahdi.    (closes issue ASTERISK-14452)  Reported by: rmudgett ........ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk?view=rev&revision=206769 By: Digium Subversion (svnbot) 2009-07-15 17:05:14 Repository: asterisk Revision: 206771 _U  branches/1.6.1/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r206771 | jpeeler | 2009-07-15 17:05:14 -0500 (Wed, 15 Jul 2009) | 16 lines Blocked revisions 206767 via svnmerge ........  r206767 | jpeeler | 2009-07-15 17:02:55 -0500 (Wed, 15 Jul 2009) | 10 lines    The dialing flag was mistakingly removed from sig_pri.    This readds the proper setting of the flag and is really a continuation of  r205731. The flag was being set properly in sig_analog, but use of the  newly added set_dialing callback allowed for some simplification in  chan_dahdi.    (closes issue ASTERISK-14452)  Reported by: rmudgett ........ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk?view=rev&revision=206771 By: Digium Subversion (svnbot) 2009-07-15 17:05:50 Repository: asterisk Revision: 206773 _U  branches/1.6.2/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r206773 | jpeeler | 2009-07-15 17:05:50 -0500 (Wed, 15 Jul 2009) | 16 lines Blocked revisions 206767 via svnmerge ........  r206767 | jpeeler | 2009-07-15 17:02:55 -0500 (Wed, 15 Jul 2009) | 10 lines    The dialing flag was mistakingly removed from sig_pri.    This readds the proper setting of the flag and is really a continuation of  r205731. The flag was being set properly in sig_analog, but use of the  newly added set_dialing callback allowed for some simplification in  chan_dahdi.    (closes issue ASTERISK-14452)  Reported by: rmudgett ........ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk?view=rev&revision=206773