Summary: | ASTERISK-14420: There are no faxes! | ||
Reporter: | eyatsko (eyatsko) | Labels: | |
Date Opened: | 2009-07-06 07:11:43 | Date Closed: | 2009-09-03 12:16:21 |
Priority: | Major | Regression? | No |
Status: | Closed/Complete | Components: | Channels/chan_sip/T.38 |
Versions: | Frequency of Occurrence | ||
Related Issues: | |||
Environment: | Attachments: | ( 0) sip_debug.txt | |
Description: | We have Debian Etch with Asterisk 1.4.25.1 installed (via make&&make install) and several mediagateways Quintum AS/AF/CMS which are set up for faxes in the same way. We have trouble with fax movement! Hereinafter: 80.251.131.142 - Asterisk 10.0.101.13 - Quintum AS 10.0.101.250 - Quintum AF 10.0.101.31 - Quintum CMS There are "t38pt_udptl=yes" in [general] and in [peer]. And I've tried to insert "t38pt_usertpsource=yes/no" with no effect. Output: ~# tshark -ni bond0 -R t38 35.476270 10.0.101.250 -> 80.251.131.142 T.38 UDP: UDPTLPacket Seq=00036 t30ind: v21-preamble 35.478562 10.0.101.13 -> 80.251.131.142 T.38 UDP: UDPTLPacket Seq=00000 t30ind: no-signal 35.546414 10.0.101.250 -> 80.251.131.142 T.38 UDP: UDPTLPacket Seq=00036 t30ind: v21-preamble 35.548914 10.0.101.13 -> 80.251.131.142 T.38 UDP: UDPTLPacket Seq=00000 t30ind: no-signal 35.616491 10.0.101.250 -> 80.251.131.142 T.38 UDP: UDPTLPacket Seq=00036 t30ind: v21-preamble 35.618576 10.0.101.13 -> 80.251.131.142 T.38 UDP: UDPTLPacket Seq=00000 t30ind: no-signal 35.686391 10.0.101.250 -> 80.251.131.142 T.38 UDP: UDPTLPacket Seq=00036 t30ind: v21-preamble 35.688580 10.0.101.13 -> 80.251.131.142 T.38 UDP: UDPTLPacket Seq=00000 t30ind: no-signal 35.756311 10.0.101.250 -> 80.251.131.142 T.38 UDP: UDPTLPacket Seq=00036 t30ind: v21-preamble 35.758603 10.0.101.13 -> 80.251.131.142 T.38 UDP: UDPTLPacket Seq=00000 t30ind: no-signal 35.826283 10.0.101.250 -> 80.251.131.142 T.38 UDP: UDPTLPacket Seq=00036 t30ind: v21-preamble 35.828587 10.0.101.13 -> 80.251.131.142 T.38 UDP: UDPTLPacket Seq=00000 t30ind: no-signal 35.896289 10.0.101.250 -> 80.251.131.142 T.38 UDP: UDPTLPacket Seq=00036 t30ind: v21-preamble 35.898613 10.0.101.13 -> 80.251.131.142 T.38 UDP: UDPTLPacket Seq=00000 t30ind: no-signal | ||
Comments: | By: eyatsko (eyatsko) 2009-07-06 07:14:57 I'm not sure but it could be useful: [SIP Debugging information moved to attached file: sip_debug.txt] By: eyatsko (eyatsko) 2009-07-06 07:28:19 It's a subject (in my opinion) what is in extensions.conf, because it worked on FreeBSD with Asterisk 1.4.11. [602] type=friend host=dynamic context=permit-national username=602 secret=95369 canreinvite=yes nat=no callerid="vpk-fax2" <602> subscribecontext=busylinefield call-limit=10 disallow=all allow=alaw allow=g729 t38pt_usertpsource=no t38pt_udptl=yes ;callgroup=1 ;pickupgroup=1 [603] type=friend host=dynamic context=permit-national username=603 secret=95369 canreinvite=yes nat=no callerid="vpk-fax3" <603> subscribecontext=busylinefield call-limit=10 disallow=all allow=alaw allow=g729 t38pt_usertpsource=no t38pt_udptl=yes ;callgroup=1 ;pickupgroup=1 By: eyatsko (eyatsko) 2009-07-06 08:39:52 And also: ~~~~~~~~~ srvtm11*CLI> debug channel SIP/603-b4f8d550 Debugging enabled on channel SIP/603-b4f8d550 Debugging on new channels is enabled The 'debug channel' command is deprecated and will be removed in a future release. Please use 'core set debug channel' instead. << [ TYPE: Null Frame (5) SUBCLASS: N/A (0) ] [SIP/603-b4f8d550] << [ TYPE: Unknown Frametype '10' (10) SUBCLASS: Unknown Subclass (76) ] [SIP/603-b4f8d550] << [ TYPE: Unknown Frametype '10' (10) SUBCLASS: Unknown Subclass (76) ] [SIP/603-b4f8d550] << [ TYPE: Unknown Frametype '10' (10) SUBCLASS: Unknown Subclass (76) ] [SIP/603-b4f8d550] << [ TYPE: Null Frame (5) SUBCLASS: N/A (0) ] [SIP/603-b4f8d550] << [ TYPE: Null Frame (5) SUBCLASS: N/A (0) ] [SIP/603-b4f8d550] << [ TYPE: Null Frame (5) SUBCLASS: N/A (0) ] [SIP/603-b4f8d550] << [ TYPE: Null Frame (5) SUBCLASS: N/A (0) ] [SIP/603-b4f8d550] << [ TYPE: Unknown Frametype '10' (10) SUBCLASS: Unknown Subclass (76) ] [SIP/603-b4f8d550] << [ TYPE: Null Frame (5) SUBCLASS: N/A (0) ] [SIP/603-b4f8d550] << [ TYPE: Unknown Frametype '10' (10) SUBCLASS: Unknown Subclass (76) ] [SIP/603-b4f8d550] << [ TYPE: Unknown Frametype '10' (10) SUBCLASS: Unknown Subclass (76) ] [SIP/603-b4f8d550] << [ TYPE: Unknown Frametype '10' (10) SUBCLASS: Unknown Subclass (76) ] [SIP/603-b4f8d550] << [ TYPE: Unknown Frametype '10' (10) SUBCLASS: Unknown Subclass (76) ] [SIP/603-b4f8d550] << [ TYPE: Null Frame (5) SUBCLASS: N/A (0) ] [SIP/603-b4f8d550] << [ TYPE: Null Frame (5) SUBCLASS: N/A (0) ] [SIP/603-b4f8d550] << [ TYPE: Unknown Frametype '10' (10) SUBCLASS: Unknown Subclass (76) ] [SIP/603-b4f8d550] << [ TYPE: Null Frame (5) SUBCLASS: N/A (0) ] [SIP/603-b4f8d550] << [ TYPE: Null Frame (5) SUBCLASS: N/A (0) ] [SIP/603-b4f8d550] << [ TYPE: Unknown Frametype '10' (10) SUBCLASS: Unknown Subclass (76) ] [SIP/603-b4f8d550] << [ TYPE: Null Frame (5) SUBCLASS: N/A (0) ] [SIP/603-b4f8d550] << [ TYPE: Unknown Frametype '10' (10) SUBCLASS: Unknown Subclass (76) ] [SIP/603-b4f8d550] << [ TYPE: Unknown Frametype '10' (10) SUBCLASS: Unknown Subclass (76) ] [SIP/603-b4f8d550] << [ TYPE: Unknown Frametype '10' (10) SUBCLASS: Unknown Subclass (76) ] [SIP/603-b4f8d550] << [ TYPE: Null Frame (5) SUBCLASS: N/A (0) ] [SIP/603-b4f8d550] << [ TYPE: Null Frame (5) SUBCLASS: N/A (0) ] [SIP/603-b4f8d550] << [ TYPE: Unknown Frametype '10' (10) SUBCLASS: Unknown Subclass (76) ] [SIP/603-b4f8d550] By: Leif Madsen (lmadsen) 2009-07-16 07:51:48 There has been a bunch of work on T.38 recently, so please keep an eye out for new releases that may contain some of this work. The 1.4.26 that will be released next week won't have it, but any 1.4.27 release candidates should. Any new 1.6.x release candidates should also contain any of the T.38 changes that will be going in shortly. By: Kevin P. Fleming (kpfleming) 2009-08-21 15:29:05 I believe this was just fixed by the patch than went in for issue 15373; you can try applying that patch to your local copy of Asterisk, or use a current checkout from the 1.4 branch in Subversion. Please let us know if this fixes the issue, thanks. By: Tilghman Lesher (tilghman) 2009-09-03 12:16:21 Suspended due to lack of activity. Please request a bug marshal in #asterisk-bugs on the IRC network irc.freenode.net to reopen the issue should you have the additional information requested. Further information can be found at http://www.asterisk.org/developers/bug-guidelines |