Summary:	ASTERISK-12880: Backport astConfigCallsActive and astConfigCallsProcessed MIB objects to Asterisk 1.4
Reporter:	Jeff Gehlbach (jeffg)	Labels:
Date Opened:	2008-10-13 09:21:42	Date Closed:	2008-10-31 04:14:34
Priority:	Minor	Regression?	No
Status:	Closed/Complete	Components:	Resources/res_snmp
Versions:		Frequency of Occurrence
Related Issues:
Environment:		Attachments:
Description:	The scalar objects astConfigCallsActive (.1.3.6.1.4.1.22736.1.2.5, tied to ast_active_calls()) and astConfigCallsProcessed (.1.3.6.1.4.1.22736.1.2.6, tied to ast_processed_calls()) should be backported to the 1.4 branch. ****** ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ****** The underlying ast_active_calls() function for astConfigCallsActive is already present in pbx.c in 1.4, but ast_processed_calls() is not.  Should be trivial to add, though.
Comments:	By: Leif Madsen (lmadsen) 2008-10-14 11:14:29 I'm not entirely sure if this should be done, and if so, I think we need to have a patch attached for that in order to move this issue forward. New features are not added to 1.4 unles it fixes a bug, and I don't know enough about res_snmp to determine whether this can be considered a bug or not. By: Leif Madsen (lmadsen) 2008-10-14 11:15:23 Assigned this issue to Russell for now in order to determine whether this is a candidate for Asterisk 1.4. If not, please close as appropriate, and if is, please state so and remove yourself as the assignee. Thanks! By: Russell Bryant (russell) 2008-10-14 13:22:31 I'm closing this out since 1.4 is feature frozen.  If I have misunderstood what is going on here and this is actually a bug, then let me know and we can look at it in more detail. By: Jeff Gehlbach (jeffg) 2008-10-30 12:52:42 It's more a deficiency than a bug. In the strictest sense this bug report is an enhancement request. I can provide a patch if somebody desires, there would be a new function in main/pbx.c and new code in res/snmp/agent.c as well as an update to doc/asterisk-mib,txt. But if we're not backporting functionality (only bugfixes) to 1.4, then this one's probably invalid. By: Russell Bryant (russell) 2008-10-31 04:14:30 Yeah, that has been the policy for 1.4.  Sorry.  :( However, we have changed the rules for 1.6, so we won't limit ourselves in this way in the future.