| Summary: | ASTERISK-11699: hanguponpolarityswitch ignored because I am not using answeronpolarityswitch | ||
| Reporter: | Ben Brown (benbrown) | Labels: | |
| Date Opened: | 2008-03-22 07:55:42 | Date Closed: | 2011-06-07 14:07:48 |
| Priority: | Minor | Regression? | No |
| Status: | Closed/Complete | Components: | Channels/chan_zap |
| Versions: | Frequency of Occurrence | ||
| Related Issues: | |||
| Environment: | Attachments: | ||
| Description: | As you can see from the debug below I am using hanguponpolarityswitch but not answeronpolarityswitch. However, the hangup polarity detection is being ignored, I believe, because p->polaritydelaytv is not being initialised and calculating the large negative delay. Perhaps line 4478 should read: if ((p->answeronpolarityswitch) && (ast_tvdiff_ms(ast_tvnow(), p->polaritydelaytv) > p->polarityonanswerdelay)) { ****** ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ****** [Mar 22 12:54:01] DEBUG[31186]: chan_zap.c:4478 zt_handle_event: Polarity Reversal event occured - DEBUG 1: channel 4, state 4, pol= 1, aonp= 0, honp= 1, pdelay= 600, tv= -695368355 [Mar 22 12:54:01] DEBUG[31186]: chan_zap.c:4485 zt_handle_event: Polarity Reversal detected but NOT hanging up (too close to answer event) on channel 4, state 4 [Mar 22 12:54:01] DEBUG[31186]: chan_zap.c:4492 zt_handle_event: Polarity Reversal event occured - DEBUG 2: channel 4, state 4, pol= 1, aonp= 0, honp= 1, pdelay= 600, tv= -695368354 | ||
| Comments: | By: Jason Parker (jparker) 2008-05-06 15:29:05 If you have a patch that you've tested, it would be useful for you to upload it here, so we can review it and potentially commit. By: snuffy (snuffy) 2008-08-22 09:59:23 Do you have any update to report on this benbrown? Possible code upload? By: Ben Brown (benbrown) 2008-09-06 18:51:13 Please close this issue, it is no longer present in Asterisk 1.4.21.2. By: snuffy (snuffy) 2008-09-07 21:03:34 Closed on reporters request. | ||