Summary:ASTERISK-09242: Asterisk 1.4.2 crash in put_unaligned_uint32
Reporter:dmb (dmb)Labels:
Date Opened:2007-04-11 04:48:58Date Closed:2011-06-07 14:00:58
Versions:Frequency of
Environment:Attachments:( 0) 9519-frchk.diff
( 1) core.1996.dbg
( 2) core.30156.gdb
( 3) core.9865.gdb
( 4) issue9519.diff
Sometimes my asterisk 1.4.2 crash in unaligned.h:49. The function is  put_unaligned_uint32. I attach the gdb result for this core.
Any idea?
Comments:By: Joshua C. Colp (jcolp) 2007-04-11 09:10:32

If the backtrace is still available please open it and do the following:

frame 2
print *f

and add the output as a note here. Thanks!

By: dmb (dmb) 2007-04-11 09:43:45

the result is:

(gdb) frame 2
#2  0x080db398 in ast_rtp_write (rtp=0x8591218, _f=0xb77b9f1c) at rtp.c:2717
2717                            ast_rtp_raw_write(rtp, f, codec);
(gdb) print *f
$1 = {frametype = 0, subclass = 0, datalen = 0, samples = 0, mallocd = 0, mallocd_hdr_len = 0, offset = 0, src = 0x0, data = 0x0,
 delivery = {tv_sec = 0, tv_usec = 0}, frame_list = {next = 0x0}, has_timing_info = 0, ts = 0, len = 0, seqno = 0}

By: dmb (dmb) 2007-04-17 09:34:09

any idea about this?

thank you

By: dmb (dmb) 2007-05-10 09:46:40

Helloooooo????? Any idea about this :)

Thank you

By: Joshua C. Colp (jcolp) 2007-05-14 11:53:21

Please try the attached patch. Thanks!

By: dmb (dmb) 2007-05-28 11:05:28

With that patch asterisk crash with the same error. I attach the gdb trace: core.9865.gdb.

Thank you!!!

By: Joshua C. Colp (jcolp) 2007-05-29 10:05:04

I need access to the machine where the core dumps are for this. Can you please email me at jcolp@digium.com so we can arrange something?

By: dmb (dmb) 2007-05-29 11:13:52

it isn't possible. What do you need? I give you all your requests.

Thank you

By: dmb (dmb) 2007-05-29 11:28:07

when asterisk crash:

/* Get a pointer to the header */
rtpheader = (unsigned char *)(f->data - hdrlen);

here f->data is null and hdrlen = 12 (C in hexa). After that subtract rtpheader value is 0xfffffff4. That's produce the crash in the next function calls. Why is the f->data null value not controled before the sustract?

Thank you

By: Joshua C. Colp (jcolp) 2007-05-29 11:46:38

Fixed in 1.4 as of revision 66437 and trunk as of revision 66438. I suspect it was never originally checked since nobody ever expected it to happen, I've added a check though now.

By: dmb (dmb) 2007-05-30 06:36:59

if you attach the diff file for this, i could verify the correction.

Thank you for all.

By: Joshua C. Colp (jcolp) 2007-05-30 11:31:22

Patch attached as issue9519.diff, if this does not fix it please reopen. Peace.

By: dmb (dmb) 2007-06-18 02:55:22

another core is reproduced in the same function with de patch. I attach the gdb file.


By: Joshua C. Colp (jcolp) 2007-06-18 08:11:20

Would it be possible to upgrade to 1.4.5? Your code is now 3 versions out of date and modified so it is difficult to track things down.

By: Russell Bryant (russell) 2007-06-19 10:00:02

What architecture is this running on?

By: Joshua C. Colp (jcolp) 2007-08-06 12:26:58

It's been a month now without a response. If you can please upgrade and post the architecture this is running on feel free to reopen.