| Summary: | ASTERISK-08450: Check type selection for sizes | ||
| Reporter: | Markus Elfring (elfring) | Labels: | |
| Date Opened: | 2006-12-28 13:30:44.000-0600 | Date Closed: | 2011-06-07 14:08:06 |
| Priority: | Minor | Regression? | No |
| Status: | Closed/Complete | Components: | Core/General |
| Versions: | Frequency of Occurrence | ||
| Related Issues: | |||
| Environment: | Attachments: | ||
| Description: | I would prefer unsigned types at some places in the source code. Do you know the rationale for the use of signed types so far? Example: How do you think about to use the data type "size_t" for parameters like "len" in the functions "send_html" and "setoption" instead of "int"? http://asterisk.org/doxygen/trunk/structast__channel__tech.html#_details I want to make sure the places that really need to store negative values. Does your development group agree on the portable value ranges? Are you concerned about a binary application interface (ABI)? | ||
| Comments: | By: Serge Vecher (serge-v) 2006-12-28 14:09:03.000-0600 elfring, again, you are using the bug-tracker to "ask questions"; please, once again, address the asterisk-dev mailing list! | ||