|Summary:||ASTERISK-07820: memory leak in 126.96.36.199 after upgrading from 1.2.10|
|Reporter:||Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk (rkarlsba)||Labels:|
|Date Opened:||2006-09-26 08:16:20||Date Closed:||2011-06-07 14:02:49|
|Environment:||Attachments:||( 0) memleak.png|
|Description:||just upgraded from 1.2.10 to 188.8.131.52 to try to reproduce ASTERISK-7811 with the newer code, and now asterisk eats lots of memory while running. after two hours run time, asterisk has allocated 777456/132196 kilobytes DRS/RSS. This did not happen with earlier versions.|
I have astmm enabled, but 'show memory ...' does not show these allocations
I may try to trace back to see where then the leak stops
|Comments:||By: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk (rkarlsba) 2006-09-26 08:16:45|
...and again i filed it undere the wrong project :P
By: Serge Vecher (serge-v) 2006-09-26 08:51:14
bad roy ;)
yes, please do track the mem leak down, we don't like those in the release branch...
By: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk (rkarlsba) 2006-09-26 08:58:23
Any idea how to debug this when it doesn't show up with astmm?
By: Serge Vecher (serge-v) 2006-09-26 09:07:48
roy: better ask the gurus on the dev list
By: Russell Bryant (russell) 2006-09-26 14:51:44
I can't think of any reason why any module that is a part of the main Asterisk distribution would have its memory allocations not show up in astmm. However, if you are using a module from Asterisk-addons, or some other 3rd party module, it most likely would not show up. Do you have anything like this in use?
By: Clod Patry (junky) 2006-09-26 23:46:12
what happened at 13? a reload or restart ?
By: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk (rkarlsba) 2006-09-27 03:34:16
russell: Just using standard -addons. And everything has been working perfectly until I added the 1.2.11, 1.2.12 and 184.108.40.206 patches
junky: 13? I do not understand.....
By: Clod Patry (junky) 2006-09-27 07:04:49
on ur graph (memleak.png)
By: Tilghman Lesher (tilghman) 2006-09-27 07:32:37
rkarlsba: which of the standard addons are you actually using? Could we see a dialplan which includes these uses?
By: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk (rkarlsba) 2006-09-27 19:34:15
Just close this.
We had a merge earlier in our svn tree and some other shite came in that caused the bug.
When I tried with a plain(er) 220.127.116.11, the bug never came up
Sorry about this
By: Clod Patry (junky) 2006-09-27 19:40:50
close per reporter's request.