Summary: | ASTERISK-07650: [patch] Chan_ooh323 needs to be taught about VLDTMF to compile against current trunk | ||
Reporter: | dea (dea) | Labels: | |
Date Opened: | 2006-08-31 20:18:55 | Date Closed: | 2006-09-14 05:19:45 |
Priority: | Major | Regression? | No |
Status: | Closed/Complete | Components: | Channels/General |
Versions: | Frequency of Occurrence | ||
Related Issues: | |||
Environment: | Attachments: | ( 0) chan_ooh323-VLDTMF-v2.diff ( 1) vldtmf_new.diff | |
Description: | The VLDTMF changes that have been merged into trunk require that chan_ooh323 be updated. Addons-SVN 287 Asterisk-SVN 41648 I am a little concerned that I munged porting these changes, but internal testing with the channel sending and receiving DTMF has been positive. I should caveat that with a warning that I do not have an H323 endpoint that uses RFC2833, but I modeled the changes after chan_sip and the code compiles without error and completes the none RFC2833 DTMF relay properly | ||
Comments: | By: Kaloyan Kovachev (knk) 2006-09-01 04:30:54 ooh323_digit_end function is calling again ast_rtp_senddigit_begin instead of ast_rtp_senddigit_end By: dea (dea) 2006-09-01 10:55:41 Good eyes. A simple cut-n-paste error, fixed in v2 By: Anthony LaMantia (alamantia) 2006-09-11 12:00:03 i have reviwed these changes and will commit them to the addons-trunk thanks again for your contributions to asterisk By: dea (dea) 2006-09-12 01:30:59 My apologies, but the last hunk in this patch is actually part of the packetization patch, and should be removed. Sorry for any trouble this caused. By: Anthony LaMantia (alamantia) 2006-09-12 13:57:47 oh, sure thing.. do you have a patch for the VLDMTF issue that we can still use? By: dea (dea) 2006-09-12 14:01:17 I can upload another version, or just delete the last 10 lines of the v2 patch attached to this bug. By: Anthony LaMantia (alamantia) 2006-09-13 12:43:24 is the new patch just posted ok with you? By: dea (dea) 2006-09-13 15:42:23 It looks clean, as in no pollution from other projects. I am not sure it it the 'right' way, but it seems to work OK here. By: Anthony LaMantia (alamantia) 2006-09-13 16:34:48 this has been done, is there anything else a-rye that you notice? By: dea (dea) 2006-09-13 20:38:59 Looks good to me. |