Summary: | ASTERISK-07413: Notifications sent with wrong Content-Type | ||
Reporter: | Jeff Siddall (jsiddall) | Labels: | |
Date Opened: | 2006-07-28 10:58:29 | Date Closed: | 2011-06-07 14:02:38 |
Priority: | Major | Regression? | No |
Status: | Closed/Complete | Components: | Channels/chan_sip/Subscriptions |
Versions: | Frequency of Occurrence | ||
Related Issues: | |||
Environment: | Attachments: | ( 0) full ( 1) full-1.2SVN ( 2) full-1.2SVN-2 ( 3) full-SVN-branch-1.2-r46406 ( 4) full-SVN-branch-1.2-r46406-2 | |
Description: | After a successful subscribe transaction subsequent notifications are sent with Content-Type: unknown even though the subscription specified Accept: application/dialog-info+xml. Notifications with the incorrect Content-Type result in SIP/2.0 415 Unacceptable Content-Type messages back from the subscriber. It is interesting to note that this problem does not occur on all subscriptions. There are usually a number of successful subscriptions in place at any given time, but as shown in the sib debug log attached below this particular resubscribe seems to cause the wrong content type to be sent, at which point the subscription is removed. ****** ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ****** Reproducible with significant regularity using Grandstream GXP-2000 phones running firmware 1.1.0.16. Below is a SIP debug log: <-- SIP read from 192.168.3.46:5060: SUBSCRIBE sip:14@server;user=phone SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.3.46:5060;branch=z9hG4bK509f29dac594a9f8 From: "User <13>" <sip:user@server>;tag=c2b860d13462b60b To: <sip:14@server;user=phone> Contact: <sip:user@192.168.3.46:5060> Call-ID: 9f7a88cff8da06f1@192.168.3.46 CSeq: 2244 SUBSCRIBE User-Agent: Grandstream GXP2000 1.1.0.16 Max-Forwards: 70 Allow: INVITE,ACK,CANCEL,BYE,NOTIFY,REFER,OPTIONS,INFO,SUBSCRIBE,UPDATE,PRACK Event: dialog Expires: 3600 Accept: application/dialog-info+xml Content-Length: 0 Jul 19 11:54:04 VERBOSE[18606] logger.c: --- (14 headers 0 lines)Jul 19 11:54:04 VERBOSE[18606] logger.c: --- (14 headers 0 lines)--- Jul 19 11:54:04 DEBUG[18606] chan_sip.c: Got a re-subscribe on existing subscription 9f7a88cff8da06f1@192.168.3.46 Jul 19 11:54:04 DEBUG[18606] chan_sip.c: Adding subscription for extension 14 context outgoing-unrestricted for peer user Jul 19 11:54:04 VERBOSE[18606] logger.c: Scheduling destruction of call '9f7a88cff8da06f1@192.168.3.46' in 3610000 ms Jul 19 11:54:04 VERBOSE[18606] logger.c: Transmitting (no NAT) to 192.168.3.46:5060: SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.3.46:5060;branch=z9hG4bK509f29dac594a9f8;received=192.168.3.46 From: "User <13>" <sip:user@server>;tag=c2b860d13462b60b To: <sip:14@server;user=phone>;tag=as1404a059 Call-ID: 9f7a88cff8da06f1@192.168.3.46 CSeq: 2244 SUBSCRIBE User-Agent: Asterisk PBX Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY Expires: 3600 Contact: <sip:14@192.168.3.1>;expires=3600 Content-Length: 0 --- Jul 19 11:54:04 VERBOSE[18606] logger.c: Reliably Transmitting (no NAT) to 192.168.3.46:5060: NOTIFY sip:user@192.168.3.46:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.3.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2542863c;rport From: <sip:14@server;user=phone>;tag=as1404a059 To: "User <13>" <sip:user@server>;tag=c2b860d13462b60b Contact: <sip:14@192.168.3.1> Call-ID: 9f7a88cff8da06f1@192.168.3.46 CSeq: 112 NOTIFY User-Agent: Asterisk PBX Max-Forwards: 70 Event: - Content-Type: unknown Subscription-State: active Content-Length: 0 | ||
Comments: | By: ajmahler (diver) 2006-08-16 12:08:45 I See this message on a 1.2.10 with GXP-2000 firmware code 1.1.1.9 and an extension unit. I did not see this error message on firmware code 1.1.1.7 and below. By: Joshua C. Colp (jcolp) 2006-08-16 12:24:30 What does sip show subscriptions come up with? is the type unknown for it? By: ajmahler (diver) 2006-08-16 12:50:14 Peer User Call ID Extension Last state Type 192.168.168.201 201 c067de2e80c 217 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 7d4004fb2dd 216 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 b889558c157 215 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 84f6228bb58 214 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 45d13826da7 213 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 973d3a1bc4c 212 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 7a613d4bfaa 211 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 81f8aa94941 210 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 02dd5ebcb8a 209 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 505525e3428 208 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 740b7ba1be5 207 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 4c86cf20ab2 206 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 be929c64335 205 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 fedee1368ce 203 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 58cfac62c81 261 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 926cb320641 260 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 372f42e3b5b 259 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 2b184676384 258 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 9380e305c69 257 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 61c954d3584 256 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 b7d7d3e2122 255 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 33d7b349dd1 254 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 35e7bce85b1 253 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 05900784d43 252 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 2f0c22268a9 251 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 e21eb9aebaa 250 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 c949870e0b2 237 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 614fdb927e9 236 InUse dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 9d8235b3367 235 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 051ce7ddbef 232 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 5700bfbf65a 231 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 b670a74ba8f 230 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 0665ae4e408 229 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 1d0adf28347 228 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 49941a3c1b3 223 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 1858371793f 222 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 484afdea494 221 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 876c882309a 220 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 ca24e883b0e 219 Idle dialog-info+xml 192.168.168.201 201 bda2e1926e1 218 Idle dialog-info+xml By: Jeff Siddall (jsiddall) 2006-08-16 12:56:16 All _active_ subscriptions show type dialog-info+xml. It appears that whenever a phone responds with a "SIP/2.0 415 Unacceptable Content-Type" to a notification with a content type of "unknown" that Asterisk removes the subscription. By: ajmahler (diver) 2006-08-16 12:59:30 I tried to roll back to 1.1.1.7 of the firmware, but the messages continue. Perhaps I changed something in the config file with this upgrade that I didn't notice. I will check By: Serge Vecher (serge-v) 2006-08-16 13:07:28 I think we need to see a complete SIP debug trace showing the problem, not just the snippets. Also, if downgrading firmware works, then perhaps it is the Grandstream firmware problem, not Asterisk. Please do the following: 1) Prepare test environment (reduce the ammount of unrelated traffic on the server); 2) Make sure your logger.conf has the following line: console => notice,warning,error,debug 3) restart Asterik. 4) Enable SIP transaction logging with the following CLI commands: set debug 4 set verbose 4 sip debug 5) Save complete console log to file and _attach_ said file to the bug. By: Joshua C. Colp (jcolp) 2006-08-16 13:07:38 The question though, is why is it being generated as "unknown"? It's weird, chan_sip has a listing internally of all the different types... when the subscription comes in it records the subscription time numerically, when it goes to make the NOTIFY it uses that numerical value to search for the subscription type information (content type for example). The only time unknown should be returned is if the type wasn't found. I'd like to get in and add some debug information if possible. By: ajmahler (diver) 2006-08-16 13:17:30 Please note that rolling back to firmware 1.1.1.7 did not clear the problem. I did make several small changes to the config including changing the dns from 0.0.0.0 to 4.2.2.2 but nothing I can see that was significant. By: ajmahler (diver) 2006-08-16 13:18:09 I will setup the debug for tonight. I cannot give you an isolated trace during business hours. This actually a production environment. By: ajmahler (diver) 2006-08-16 13:50:20 OK...this is weird. I re-updated the phone to 1.1.1.9 from 1.1.1.7 and the problem went away. Go figure... By: Joshua C. Colp (jcolp) 2006-08-16 13:52:26 How very very strange... I guess the moral of this story is to... reflash your phone 42 times to be sure? :D would you be okay with closing the bug since it appears to have been your phone? By: ajmahler (diver) 2006-08-16 13:55:07 I didn't open this bug, I just was adding information. I have Grandstream looking at it also, I will update you when they give me more information. By: Joshua C. Colp (jcolp) 2006-08-16 13:57:39 Ah, I got mixed up. I will await a reply from the original poster as well and we can go from there! By: ajmahler (diver) 2006-08-16 14:08:37 Spoke too soon, its baaaaacccccckkkkk! :( By: Jeff Siddall (jsiddall) 2006-08-16 15:07:09 I can attest to the intermittentness of the problem. Sometimes everything will be good for an hour or two. Also, from the SIP debug log I included in "Additional Information" above (sorry about the attach thing, but there were only three messages), you can see the SUBSCRIBE has the correct "Accept: application/dialog-info+xml" field, and then immediately (within the same second) a 200 OK reply and a NOTIFY from Asterisk with the content type "unknown". Clearly not a phone issue. By: Serge Vecher (serge-v) 2006-08-16 15:18:40 Maybe these lines have something to do with it. Jul 19 11:54:04 DEBUG[18606] chan_sip.c: Got a re-subscribe on existing subscription 9f7a88cff8da06f1@192.168.3.46 Jul 19 11:54:04 DEBUG[18606] chan_sip.c: Adding subscription for extension 14 context outgoing-unrestricted for peer user Jsiddall: we still need to see a full debug, not just a snippet. By: Jeff Siddall (jsiddall) 2006-08-16 15:35:12 Yeah, I'll work on the debug log, but this is a production system so it'll have to be after hours sometime. I'll see if I can do it tonight. The evidence does seem to indicate that the problem happens after a re-subscribe of a previously successful subscription. IIRC the phones do this every hour by default. By: ajmahler (diver) 2006-08-18 07:59:55 I was doing testing on this phone and discovered the cat5 patch cord was bad from the phone to the wall jack. Replacing the cable made the problem go away. By: Serge Vecher (serge-v) 2006-09-06 11:59:30 jsidall: gentle reminder on those logs By: Jeff Siddall (jsiddall) 2006-09-06 13:48:15 Sorry, grabbing the logs got put on the back burner. Attached is a log which includes a REGISTER followed by a bunch of SUBSCRIBE and NOTIFYs. This is actually a re-register and re-subscribes as this user has been logged in for a long time and nothing has been changed recently. By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2006-10-25 14:18:20 Think I fixed this in svn trunk 1.4. Need to check 1.2 too. Rev 46252 - can you please try this version? By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2006-10-25 14:28:06 Added a new debug line to chan_sip.c in 1.2. Can you please test with latest svn in the 1.2 branch and capture the output? I don't see the same problem in the 1.2 code base as I found in 1.4. By: Jeff Siddall (jsiddall) 2006-10-27 23:24:44 I installed the latest 1.2 branch SVN tonight and am waiting for the problem to occur. I'll upload the logs if/when it does. By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2006-10-28 10:35:30 Thanks for helping, waiting for results... :-) By: Jeff Siddall (jsiddall) 2006-10-28 14:12:47 Good news/bad news: it still happens. Hopefully the attached snip from the debug log full-1.2SVN will help pinpoint the problem. By: Jeff Siddall (jsiddall) 2006-10-28 14:56:44 I did some more looking through the logs to try to find the last successful NOTIFY, and found something that looked strange to me. I attached the logs for this as full-1.2SVN-2. Keep in mind I did a sip debug ip 192.168.3.45 (the subscriber I picked to monitor) to keep the SIP debugging to a dull roar so there is no sip debug for other subscribers. Not exactly sure why but the state of the subscriber I was monitoring goes state 5 (Unavailable) in line 2, but then two NOTIFYs go out in rapid succession (within a second). Look at line 6, then 96. Line 96 and onward all have invalid content type. Not sure if anyone can make sense of all this, but since it seems odd I thought I'd throw it in. By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2006-10-29 12:56:48.000-0600 Finally found the bug. Thanks for following up! Please test the latest 1.2 from subversion. The phone obviously does not re-subscribe in time, so the subscription expires. By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2006-10-29 12:57:25.000-0600 Please re-open if the issue remains. By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2006-10-29 13:04:23.000-0600 Fix committed to 1.2 rev 46402 By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2006-10-29 13:16:52.000-0600 Asterisk 1.4, rev 46403, svn trunk rev 46405 By: Jeff Siddall (jsiddall) 2006-10-30 19:45:07.000-0600 D'oooh,.. still getting 415's. I re-enabled debug logging and will attach updated logs once I have them. Show version says: Asterisk SVN-branch-1.2-r46406 By: Jeff Siddall (jsiddall) 2006-10-30 19:55:30.000-0600 I attached logs as full-SVN-branch-1.2-r46406. Not sure that this shows anything new though, so let me know if you want me to watch for something specific. By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2006-10-31 02:25:38.000-0600 Hmm. At least this is a different message. I need you to capture what goes on before the bad message too, at least one successful NOTIFY before the bad one - that's what caught my eye on the other issue. Thanks. By: Jeff Siddall (jsiddall) 2006-10-31 11:15:39.000-0600 I attached an "interesting" bit of log as full-SVN-branch-1.2-r46406-2. In this snip the monitored user (192.168.3.45) hangs up a call to another user, then gets a successful NOTIFY in line 84, followed by unsuccessful ones in lines 116, 142, and 184. Let me know if that helps. By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2006-11-12 14:02:44.000-0600 From reading the source this is impossible. Guess I have to read again... :-) By: Jeff Siddall (jsiddall) 2006-11-19 20:47:31.000-0600 Anything else I can do to help get this resolved? If you know what is triggering this bug I will also ask Grandstream to fix the problem. By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2007-02-14 10:55:33.000-0600 This bug still boggles my mind. By: John Coleman (ninthclowd) 2007-03-07 16:51:58.000-0600 Any word on whether or not this is a Grandstream issue? By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2007-05-16 03:54:39 Let's take this bull by the horns. First, I need to know if the problem exists in the latest asterisk versions? By: Michel Belleau (malaiwah) 2007-05-24 11:17:37 I'm on Asterisk 1.2.17, Gentoo distro and I have Grandstream GXP-2000 phones that do the same trick mentionned here every once in a while, as this is a production environnement I'll try to get some logs outside usage hours: May 24 11:09:19 VERBOSE[4118] logger.c: -- Incoming call: Got SIP response 415 "Unacceptable Content-Type" back from 70.82.177.77 May 24 11:09:19 VERBOSE[4118] logger.c: -- Incoming call: Got SIP response 415 "Unacceptable Content-Type" back from 70.82.177.77 May 24 11:09:19 VERBOSE[4118] logger.c: -- Incoming call: Got SIP response 415 "Unacceptable Content-Type" back from 70.82.177.77 May 24 11:09:19 VERBOSE[4118] logger.c: -- Incoming call: Got SIP response 415 "Unacceptable Content-Type" back from 70.82.177.77 May 24 11:09:19 VERBOSE[4118] logger.c: -- Incoming call: Got SIP response 415 "Unacceptable Content-Type" back from 70.82.177.77 May 24 11:09:19 VERBOSE[4118] logger.c: -- Incoming call: Got SIP response 415 "Unacceptable Content-Type" back from 70.82.177.77 May 24 11:09:20 VERBOSE[4118] logger.c: -- Incoming call: Got SIP response 415 "Unacceptable Content-Type" back from 70.82.177.77 May 24 11:09:20 VERBOSE[4118] logger.c: -- Incoming call: Got SIP response 415 "Unacceptable Content-Type" back from 70.82.177.77 May 24 11:09:27 VERBOSE[4118] logger.c: -- Incoming call: Got SIP response 415 "Unacceptable Content-Type" back from 70.82.177.77 May 24 11:09:27 VERBOSE[4118] logger.c: -- Incoming call: Got SIP response 415 "Unacceptable Content-Type" back from 70.82.177.77 May 24 11:32:12 VERBOSE[4118] logger.c: -- Incoming call: Got SIP response 415 "Unacceptable Content-Type" back from 70.82.177.77 May 24 11:32:55 VERBOSE[4118] logger.c: -- Incoming call: Got SIP response 415 "Unacceptable Content-Type" back from 70.82.177.77 May 24 11:37:32 VERBOSE[4118] logger.c: -- Incoming call: Got SIP response 415 "Unacceptable Content-Type" back from 70.82.177.77 May 24 12:07:12 VERBOSE[4118] logger.c: -- Incoming call: Got SIP response 415 "Unacceptable Content-Type" back from 70.82.177.77 May 24 12:09:48 VERBOSE[4118] logger.c: -- Incoming call: Got SIP response 415 "Unacceptable Content-Type" back from 70.82.177.77 May 24 12:09:48 VERBOSE[4118] logger.c: -- Incoming call: Got SIP response 415 "Unacceptable Content-Type" back from 70.82.177.77 May 24 12:09:49 VERBOSE[4118] logger.c: -- Incoming call: Got SIP response 415 "Unacceptable Content-Type" back from 70.82.177.77 May 24 12:09:49 VERBOSE[4118] logger.c: -- Incoming call: Got SIP response 415 "Unacceptable Content-Type" back from 70.82.177.77 By: Wolfgang Liegel (wliegel) 2007-05-25 04:56:32 I have this problem with Asterisk Version 1.2.18 You can solve this problem temporarly by rebooting all GXP2000 Phones. You can solve this problem permanently by upgrading to 1.1.2.23 or later. According to http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/GXP-2000 this issue is fixed in GXP-2000 Firmware 1.1.2.23 > Fixed we send 415 response for NOTIFY when no Content-Type header is present By: Joshua C. Colp (jcolp) 2007-06-27 18:33:33 Since this seems to have been a Grandstream issue I'm closing this out... everyone update their firmware! |