Summary: | ASTERISK-07332: [patch][post 1.4] NUMERAL function - numeral selection for Russian and Ukrainian language | ||
Reporter: | Oleg Oleg (theedge) | Labels: | |
Date Opened: | 2006-07-13 04:00:56 | Date Closed: | 2011-06-07 14:02:46 |
Priority: | Major | Regression? | No |
Status: | Closed/Complete | Components: | Core/Internationalization |
Versions: | Frequency of Occurrence | ||
Related Issues: | |||
Environment: | Attachments: | ( 0) patch.func_numeral.c | |
Description: | Helper function for correct numeral selection for russian language, i.e.: 1 rubl 3 rublya 7 rubley So a call to the function like NUMERAL(158,hrivna,hrivni,hriven) returns 'hriven'. Tested in * 1.2.9.1. ****** ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ****** exten => 51,n,SayNumber(${COUNT},f) exten => 51,n,Playback(cash/${NUMERAL(${COUNT},rubl,rublya,rubley)}) | ||
Comments: | By: Serge Vecher (serge-v) 2006-07-13 08:45:03 Quick comments: 1. Please get a disclaimer on file (the edhttp://bugs.digium.com/main_page.php) and confirm with a note when done. 2. This is actually a new feature, so the patch needs to be tested against trunk, as this is where it maybe merged if all conditions are satisfied. By: Oleg Oleg (theedge) 2006-07-25 02:40:19 1. I'll try to send a disclaimer ASAP. Will it be ok if I put my name and signature to http://www.digium.com/disclaim.changes 2. I couldn't delete the old attach, so I upload a patch against trunk 38041 By: Serge Vecher (serge-v) 2006-07-25 08:09:31 1. yes By: Tilghman Lesher (tilghman) 2006-07-25 12:16:46 Could you provide a better description as to what this function is doing? I'm not at all clear on this, nor why it is needed. By: Oleg Oleg (theedge) 2006-07-26 01:17:04 Ok, in English it's simple to spell cardinal numeral, in Russian and Ukrainian language it's a bit trickier, we say: odin rubl (1) p'yat rubley (5) dvesty dva rublya (202) So we need to know a correct cardinal numeral for certain number, so it spells gramatically correct. That's it in a nutshell. By: Tilghman Lesher (tilghman) 2006-07-26 08:35:48 I'm asking Paul Cadach to take a look at this, as a native speaker. By: Paul Cadach (pcadach) 2006-08-31 23:50:46 Formatting review isn't passed, and negative values isn't handled. Better is to use additional variables for number % 100 and eliminate usage of array with 3 possible values (better is to do sequence of if()s). By: jmls (jmls) 2006-11-01 06:28:29.000-0600 theedge, would you respond to the comments made by PCadach ? Thanks. By: Tilghman Lesher (tilghman) 2007-01-09 08:26:38.000-0600 No response from reporter. |