Summary:	ASTERISK-06574: [patch] attended transfer use transferer context first and set who is transfering at the beginning
Reporter:	Moises Silva (moy)	Labels:
Date Opened:	2006-03-20 10:19:00.000-0600	Date Closed:	2006-05-26 13:00:18
Priority:	Major	Regression?	No
Status:	Closed/Complete	Components:	Resources/res_features
Versions:		Frequency of Occurrence
Related Issues:
Environment:		Attachments:	( 0) asterisk-svn-24742-transfer.patch
Description:	This is more a small fix and features request. Not sure if is usefull for more people, hopefully it is. I think it makes more sense to use the transferer context first, since is the one who is transferring. (the old behaviour was using FEATURE_SENSE_PEER). this patch swap that behaviour. As additional feature sets the variable TRANSFERERNAME in the new channel so can know from the very beggining what channel is transfering, i use this in my AGI script to make some decisions based on the real channel, not Local/ madness.
Comments:	By: Moises Silva (moy) 2006-03-20 10:19:54.000-0600 forget to put that i have already sign/fax a disclaimer. 10 minutes ago. By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2006-04-07 02:12:54 Makes sense to check the transferers TRANSFER_CONTEXT first. By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2006-04-07 02:13:14 Guess we have to note this in UPGRADE.TXT if we change it. By: Moises Silva (moy) 2006-04-11 18:34:55 i guess so, but how to proceed? what can i do? By: Serge Vecher (serge-v) 2006-05-03 12:51:05 moy: are you able to modify your patch to accomodate oej's suggestion? The patch needs to be redone anyway against the trunk, since it is a new feature. By: Moises Silva (moy) 2006-05-03 15:16:33 Vechers: Only needed to include in the patch a change for UPGRADE.txt? sure I Can.  I will make the patch again. Ill post it tomorrow afternoon. Thanks By: Moises Silva (moy) 2006-05-04 13:36:36 anything else? Thanks for your attention. By: Serge Vecher (serge-v) 2006-05-25 13:34:48 moy: can you please join the #asterisk-dev channel on IRC and discuss this bug with the development team? Thanks. By: Joshua C. Colp (jcolp) 2006-05-26 13:00:18 In trunk as of revision 30548 with minor mods done by myself. Thanks a lot!