[Home]

Summary:ASTERISK-06561: Asterisk duplicates results for enumlookups
Reporter:evilbunny (evilbunny)Labels:
Date Opened:2006-03-16 22:39:16.000-0600Date Closed:2006-04-05 10:50:55
Priority:MinorRegression?No
Status:Closed/CompleteComponents:Core/General
Versions:Frequency of
Occurrence
Related
Issues:
Environment:Attachments:
Description:It seems asterisk doesn't cache dns results, so if you loop through results (as in the enum complaint example http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/RFC+Compliant+ENUM+Macro) if there are multiple results asterisk will try the same route multiple times as it expects the results from the dns cache to be in the same order all the time, but this doesn't occur.

Asterisk needs to some how cache results for the duration of a call, rather then constant calls to DNS lookups...
Comments:By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2006-03-17 03:07:01.000-0600

Tricky one. Wonder if dnsmanager can help here.
By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2006-04-04 09:01:01

Closing this feature request. Agree that we need to fix something here. But as we don't have code for it or coders available, I need to close it while waiting for updates.
By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2006-04-04 09:01:01

Closing this feature request. Agree that we need to fix something here. But as we don't have code for it or coders available, I need to close it while waiting for updates.
By: evilbunny (evilbunny) 2006-04-05 08:45:09

Why should the bug be closed, nothing is resolved and it just makes it more likely to get a second bug opened for the same issue later because someone thinks there is no open issue for it.
By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2006-04-05 08:50:42

We do close feature requests after having them open for discussion for a week or two. However, I will add a pointer to this bug report in enum.c in a todo item so we remember it.
By: evilbunny (evilbunny) 2006-04-05 09:23:04

So sweeping the bugs under the rug and just ignoring them then :)
By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2006-04-05 10:23:00

Contact me on IRC to discuss this. This is not a bug, it's a feature request. Do not re-open before we agree on it. Thanks.
By: evilbunny (evilbunny) 2006-04-05 10:43:57

Ummm no, asking for a feature to work correctly (according to RFCs) is not a feature request, it's a bug, basically this function doesn't work as advertised.
By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2006-04-05 10:49:32

evilbunny: Please do as told, contact me on IRC.