Summary: | ASTERISK-05445: route by caller id problom | ||
Reporter: | Schneur (rosenbergs) | Labels: | |
Date Opened: | 2005-11-04 01:16:26.000-0600 | Date Closed: | 2011-06-07 14:10:15 |
Priority: | Minor | Regression? | No |
Status: | Closed/Complete | Components: | Core/General |
Versions: | Frequency of Occurrence | ||
Related Issues: | |||
Environment: | Attachments: | ||
Description: | I wanted that when a certain # calls in he should be able to call out This did not work: exten => s/7329876543,1,DISA(no-password|internal) But when I added one line before it did work: exten => s/7329876543,1,background(enternum) exten => s/7329876543,2,DISA(no-password|internal) | ||
Comments: | By: BJ Weschke (bweschke) 2005-11-04 07:33:58.000-0600 we need some trace information please. I just checked app_disa from the latest 1-0 tree and it should answer the channel if it's not up already, so we need some tracing information from your setup plus the exact "show version" you're running in order for us to diagnose the problem further. By: BJ Weschke (bweschke) 2005-11-08 11:39:01.000-0600 rosenbergs: we need some addt'l feedback from you on this bug or we will close it for lack of data required to reproduce. please advise. thanks. By: Serge Vecher (serge-v) 2005-11-08 12:08:18.000-0600 Shouldn't the first line be Answer()? By: BJ Weschke (bweschke) 2005-11-08 12:30:02.000-0600 that was my first thought, but I've checked app_disa from the latest 1-0 tree and CVS-HEAD and both have it so that if the chan state isn't AST_STATE_UP already, it'll call answer internally, so it shouldn't technically be necessary I think. By: Serge Vecher (serge-v) 2005-11-08 13:06:13.000-0600 rosenbergs is using 1.0.9 By: BJ Weschke (bweschke) 2005-11-08 13:09:50.000-0600 I know. I checked the 1.0.9 app_disa too. By: BJ Weschke (bweschke) 2005-11-09 12:02:07.000-0600 No addt'l feedback provided to help resolve/reproduce this. Closing. Pls re-open if you have addt'l information. |