Summary: | ASTERISK-05327: [patch] 100 trying after BYE/200 OK keeps session alive for ever and ever | ||
Reporter: | Olle Johansson (oej) | Labels: | |
Date Opened: | 2005-10-19 13:41:57 | Date Closed: | 2008-01-15 15:53:04.000-0600 |
Priority: | Minor | Regression? | No |
Status: | Closed/Complete | Components: | Channels/chan_sip/Interoperability |
Versions: | Frequency of Occurrence | ||
Related Issues: | |||
Environment: | Attachments: | ( 0) tryingafterbye.txt | |
Description: | Matt Hess reported this issue on the -users mailing list. If we get 100 trying, after BYE/200 OK, Asterisk cancels destruction of call. The patch fixes this hopefully. ****** ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ****** 1. TxReqRel INVITE / 102 INVITE 2. Rx SIP/2.0 / 102 INVITE 3. CancelDestroy 4. Rx SIP/2.0 / 102 INVITE 5. CancelDestroy 6. Unhold SIP/2.0 7. Rx SIP/2.0 / 102 INVITE 8. CancelDestroy 9. Unhold SIP/2.0 10. Rx SIP/2.0 / 102 INVITE 11. CancelDestroy 12. Unhold SIP/2.0 13. TxReq ACK / 102 ACK 14. TxReqRel INVITE / 103 INVITE 15. Rx SIP/2.0 / 103 INVITE 16. CancelDestroy 17. Rx SIP/2.0 / 103 INVITE 18. CancelDestroy 19. Unhold SIP/2.0 20. TxReq ACK / 103 ACK 21. TxReqRel INVITE / 104 INVITE 22. Rx BYE / 302 BYE 23. TxResp SIP/2.0 / 302 BYE 24. Rx SIP/2.0 / 104 INVITE 25. CancelDestroy | ||
Comments: | By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2005-10-20 11:02:40 Matt Hess writes: Dead channels are still happening.. but at a greatly reduced rate as compared to yesterday before the patch you sent. By: Kevin P. Fleming (kpfleming) 2005-10-31 18:11:51.000-0600 Committed to CVS HEAD, thanks! By: Digium Subversion (svnbot) 2008-01-15 15:53:04.000-0600 Repository: asterisk Revision: 6912 U trunk/channels/chan_sip.c ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r6912 | kpfleming | 2008-01-15 15:53:03 -0600 (Tue, 15 Jan 2008) | 2 lines properly handle '100 Trying' that arrives after a dialog has been dropped (issue ASTERISK-5327) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk?view=rev&revision=6912 |