[Home]

Summary:ASTERISK-05272: Changes between 1.2-beta1 and latest CVS HEAD make all SIP calls from PROXY fail..
Reporter:Stephen Lombard (grumpy)Labels:
Date Opened:2005-10-10 04:45:10Date Closed:2011-06-07 14:02:36
Priority:MajorRegression?No
Status:Closed/CompleteComponents:Channels/chan_sip/Interoperability
Versions:Frequency of
Occurrence
Related
Issues:
Environment:Attachments:
Description:Using SER as a front-end proxy and dialling an invalid extension I get this on Asterisk 1.2beta1

Oct 10 17:30:36 WARNING[29605]: pbx.c:2278 __ast_pbx_run: Channel 'SIP/digitronix.sip.digitronix.com.au-086718e0' sent into invalid extension '900' in context 'digitronix.pstn.digitronix.com.au', but no invalid handler

However, the same extension on CVS HEAD (as of 10 October 2005) gives:

Oct 10 17:30:36 WARNING[29918]: pbx.c:2362 __ast_pbx_run: Channel 'SIP/digitronix.sip.digitronix.com.au-086718e0' sent into invalid extension '900' in context 'digitronix.pstn.digitronix.c', but no invalid handler

Valid extensions on Asterisk 1.2-beta1 pass through perfectly between SER and Asterisk but irrespective of the extension, whether valid or not, fail on the latest CVS HEAD.
Comments:By: Stephen Lombard (grumpy) 2005-10-10 05:14:29

I guess further to that, here's how the truncting of the domain (always last 5 characters) affects things:

Oct 10 17:30:36 WARNING[29918]: pbx.c:2362 __ast_pbx_run: Channel 'SIP/digitronix.sip.digitronix.com.au-086718e0' sent into invalid extension '900' in context 'digitronix.pstn.digitronix.c', but no invalid handler

Oct 10 17:30:36 WARNING[30232]: pbx.c:2362 __ast_pbx_run: Channel 'SIP/ham.sip.digitronix.com.au-086718e0' sent into invalid extension '900' in context 'ham.pstn.digitronix.c', but no invalid handler

Always the last 5 characters being truncated irrespective of the domain's length...

By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2005-10-10 12:07:24

According to the instructions, you need to provide a complete SIP debug for SIP bugs you report.

By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2005-10-11 23:39:02

And for this, we will need to see your dialplan and sip.conf as well. Thank you for a quick reply, since we are eager to find this bug.

By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2005-10-13 16:26:28

We will close this if we do not get a reply soon, since we can't replicate it.

By: BJ Weschke (bweschke) 2005-10-13 19:11:08

Can we have a copy of ser.cfg too so we can get close to reproducing the environment to reproduce?

By: twisted (twisted) 2005-10-17 23:11:12

grumpy:  we need more information.  If you cannot provide the requested information, please at least let us know what we can do to reproduce the issue.  

Thanks

By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2005-10-20 01:41:58

No answer from reporter. Please re-open if you have responses.