[Home]

Summary:ASTERISK-05079: The sdp-anat option tag is defined in RFC 4092
Reporter:mikma (mikma)Labels:
Date Opened:2005-09-14 04:20:02Date Closed:2008-01-15 15:48:23.000-0600
Priority:TrivialRegression?No
Status:Closed/CompleteComponents:Core/General
Versions:Frequency of
Occurrence
Related
Issues:
Environment:Attachments:( 0) anat.patch
Description:The sdp-anat option tag is defined in RFC 4092: Usage of the SDP ANAT Semantics in the SIP.

Shouldn't the tag be sdp-anat and not sdp_anat in sip_options?


****** ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ******

--- channels/chan_sip.c 13 Sep 2005 01:38:00 -0000 1.847
+++ channels/chan_sip.c 14 Sep 2005 08:53:27 -0000
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@
{ SIP_OPT_PRECONDITION, NOT_SUPPORTED, "precondition" },
/* RFC3323: Privacy with proxies*/
{ SIP_OPT_PRIVACY, NOT_SUPPORTED, "privacy" },
- /* Not yet RFC, but registred with IANA */
+ /* RFC4092: Usage of the SDP ANAT Semantics in the SIP */
{ SIP_OPT_SDP_ANAT, NOT_SUPPORTED, "sdp_anat" },
/* RFC3329: Security agreement mechanism */
{ SIP_OPT_SEC_AGREE, NOT_SUPPORTED, "sec_agree" },
Comments:By: Michael Jerris (mikej) 2005-09-14 05:38:51

Can you please provide the section of rfc that defines this, along with a disclaimed patch to fix this.
By: mikma (mikma) 2005-09-14 05:56:08

RFC 4092:

3.  The sdp-anat Option-Tag

  We define the option-tag sdp-anat for use in the Require and
  Supported SIP [3] header fields.  SIP user agents that place this
  option-tag in a Supported header field understand the ANAT semantics
  as defined in [7].
By: Kevin P. Fleming (kpfleming) 2005-09-14 17:45:38

Committed to CVS HEAD, thanks!
By: Digium Subversion (svnbot) 2008-01-15 15:48:23.000-0600

Repository: asterisk
Revision: 6601

U   trunk/channels/chan_sip.c

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r6601 | kpfleming | 2008-01-15 15:48:23 -0600 (Tue, 15 Jan 2008) | 2 lines

proper header name and attribution (issue ASTERISK-5079)

------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk?view=rev&revision=6601