[Home]

Summary:ASTERISK-04612: 'restart' fails with asterisk -U
Reporter:Tzafrir Cohen (tzafrir)Labels:
Date Opened:2005-07-18 13:54:32Date Closed:2008-01-15 15:44:57.000-0600
Priority:MinorRegression?No
Status:Closed/CompleteComponents:Core/General
Versions:Frequency of
Occurrence
Related
Issues:
Environment:Attachments:( 0) asterisk_restart_noroot.diff.txt
Description:When asterisk is started with -U username, it will crash when trying to restart.

restart is basicaly exec-ing the original command. However by the time asterisk restarts it no longer has priviliges for setuid, setgid and set_priority . As a result it will crash when it attempts to run the first of those three.

Solution: simply don't do either of those. They are still in effect. My current solution is to pass this through the environment. An alternative approach is to manipulate argv, but I believe it is more complicated.

****** ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ******

Attached is a patch to 1.0.9 . I don't have time to test it with HEAD right now, and hence no [patch] prefix.
Comments:By: Russell Bryant (russell) 2005-07-18 13:59:33

Did you purposely say "No" to the question about your disclaimer?

By: Clod Patry (junky) 2005-07-19 11:41:15

We need patch for HEAD, and we can't use your patch, cause you have no disclaimer on file.

By: Tzafrir Cohen (tzafrir) 2005-07-19 12:57:09

patch seems to apply to HEAD. I can't test a build of it yet.

However: I'd just like to verify that this is still a problem with HEAD: if you have asterisk running as a user, will it successfully restart after a 'restart now' CLI command?

By: Michael Jerris (mikej) 2005-07-19 13:36:45

we need to know if you have a disclaimer.

By: Tzafrir Cohen (tzafrir) 2005-07-19 19:35:50

Private communication is not enough, aparantly. So here it is again: I wrote "No" and "no" means "no". Rationale was clarified in private communication.

Mean while, noone has commented on the bug report itself (solution aside).

By: Clod Patry (junky) 2005-07-19 21:50:31

Not having a disclaimer will result, none will look at your patch.

By: Tzafrir Cohen (tzafrir) 2005-07-19 22:15:27

Let's run this again:

Me: this bug has no [patch] prefix to it. Is it reproducable. There is a patch but I don't have the time to clean it right now.

Reply 1: is the "no" a real "no" for the disclaimer?

Reply 2: does the patch work for HEAD? Where is the disclaimer?

Me: seems to apply to HEAD. Untested. But is the problem reproduced in HEAD?

Reply 3: we need to know if you have a disclaimer.

[in private communication: I can't disclaim it right now. I will]

Me: No means no. reproducable in HEAD? [bug is easy to reproduce]

Reply 4: Not having a disclaimer will result, none will look at your patch.



So, current reply: please ignore the patch. s/patch//g in this report for a moment.  Hmm.. I think I'll try that method.

By: Tilghman Lesher (tilghman) 2005-07-19 22:54:11

Patch removed with consent of poster, due to no disclaimer.  Patch can be reuploaded when a disclaimer is on file.

By: Michael Jerris (mikej) 2005-07-26 21:27:51

any update?

By: Clod Patry (junky) 2005-07-28 00:24:29

debian:/etc/asterisk# asterisk -Ucli
Unable to open pid file '/var/run//asterisk.pid': Permission denied
debian:/etc/asterisk# ls -l /var/run//asterisk.pid
ls: /var/run//asterisk.pid: No such file or directory
debian:/etc/asterisk#

By: Tzafrir Cohen (tzafrir) 2005-07-28 01:11:01

What exactly is the username here? 'cli' ?

Anyway, when running Asterisk as a user you would normally set something like:

astrundir => /var/run/asterisk
astlogdir => /var/log/asterisk

in asterisk.conf, and give the Asterisk user write permissions to those directories.

Another thing to consider when touching that part of the code: what if someone wants to run Asterisk in a chroot jail? Currently this won't work, I believe.

By: Michael Jerris (mikej) 2005-08-09 13:11:25

This is not major, as there is a workaround.

By: Tzafrir Cohen (tzafrir) 2005-08-10 15:01:27

The workaround presented here is not relevant to the bug itself. It is a work around a simpler problem (a simpler file permissions issue).

Here the issue is the permissions of the Asterisk process itself. Asterisk needs some permissions at start-time. Obtaining those permissions requires root. On "restart" asterisk re-execs and is quite upset when it finds out it fails to have enough permissions to ask for extra priviliges (even though it actually doesn't need to).

By: Michael Jerris (mikej) 2005-08-10 15:04:19

The workaround is to run as root.  Not saying this is not a bug, but just that it is not Major as defined in the bug guidelines.

By: Tzafrir Cohen (tzafrir) 2005-08-11 11:43:33

Resubmitting the patch to solve the problem. Patch is disclaimed.

By: Kevin P. Fleming (kpfleming) 2005-08-22 21:35:36

Committed to CVS HEAD, thanks!

By: Digium Subversion (svnbot) 2008-01-15 15:44:57.000-0600

Repository: asterisk
Revision: 6369

U   trunk/asterisk.c

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r6369 | kpfleming | 2008-01-15 15:44:57 -0600 (Tue, 15 Jan 2008) | 2 lines

don't try to change run priority, EUID or EGID on restart if they were already set (issue ASTERISK-4612 with minor mods)

------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk?view=rev&revision=6369