Summary: | ASTERISK-03856: [patch] ast_say_digit_str skips minus | ||
Reporter: | Anthony Minessale (anthm) | Labels: | |
Date Opened: | 2005-04-04 09:51:21 | Date Closed: | 2008-01-15 15:30:37.000-0600 |
Priority: | Minor | Regression? | No |
Status: | Closed/Complete | Components: | Core/General |
Versions: | Frequency of Occurrence | ||
Related Issues: | |||
Environment: | Attachments: | ( 0) say.c.diff | |
Description: | ast_say_digit_str ignores negative numbers and reads them as positive. this patch lets it say "minus one" when it is fed -1 ****** ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ****** Disclaimer on file. anthmct@yahoo.com | ||
Comments: | By: Michael Jerris (mikej) 2005-04-04 10:23:36 should we be saying "minus" or "negative" By: Kevin P. Fleming (kpfleming) 2005-04-04 11:18:05 I think 'minus' is acceptable, it's pretty common English usage. Also, we don't have a recording for 'negative' :-) I've committed this to CVS; if we get complaints about not saying 'negative' the complainers can provide the new recording. Thanks! By: Russell Bryant (russell) 2005-04-05 01:42:30 fixed in 1.0 as well (had to add minus.gsm while I was at it) By: Digium Subversion (svnbot) 2008-01-15 15:30:27.000-0600 Repository: asterisk Revision: 5384 U trunk/say.c ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r5384 | kpfleming | 2008-01-15 15:30:27 -0600 (Tue, 15 Jan 2008) | 2 lines let ast_say_digit_str say 'minus' preceding negative numbers (bug ASTERISK-3856) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk?view=rev&revision=5384 By: Digium Subversion (svnbot) 2008-01-15 15:30:37.000-0600 Repository: asterisk Revision: 5395 U branches/v1-0/say.c ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r5395 | russell | 2008-01-15 15:30:37 -0600 (Tue, 15 Jan 2008) | 2 lines say "minus" for negative numbers (bug ASTERISK-3856) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk?view=rev&revision=5395 |