[Home]

Summary:ASTERISK-03628: no difference between strategy roundrobin & rrmemory
Reporter:karlo (karlo)Labels:
Date Opened:2005-03-04 08:59:25.000-0600Date Closed:2005-03-05 22:00:21.000-0600
Priority:MinorRegression?No
Status:Closed/CompleteComponents:Applications/app_queue
Versions:Frequency of
Occurrence
Related
Issues:
Environment:Attachments:
Description:When using strategy roundrobin the position in the queue is always remembered as is the case with rrmemory, there does not seem to be any difference between the two. I would like the the members in a queue to be called in the same sequence each time the queue is entered.
Comments:By: Brian West (bkw918) 2005-03-04 09:15:15.000-0600

This is not a major bug please re-read the bug posting guidelines.

/b

By: Clod Patry (junky) 2005-03-04 17:45:38.000-0600

which HEAD version?
please attach your configs.

By: Mark Spencer (markster) 2005-03-04 22:38:47.000-0600

roundrobin and rrmemory are truly different in that roundrobin always starts at the next spot in the list, while rrmemory starts at the next one after the last non-busy one which was rung.  There is no strategy to do what you want, however you can simply use ringall with incrementing penalties in the order you want them to ring.