Summary: | ASTERISK-03621: [patch] get more useful info from zttest | ||
Reporter: | Michael Labuschke (zigman) | Labels: | |
Date Opened: | 2005-03-02 19:37:06.000-0600 | Date Closed: | 2008-06-07 10:50:17 |
Priority: | Major | Regression? | No |
Status: | Closed/Complete | Components: | Core/General |
Versions: | Frequency of Occurrence | ||
Related Issues: | |||
Environment: | Attachments: | ( 0) zaptel2.diff.txt ( 1) zttest_rev1.diff.txt | |
Description: | After running zttest i would like to know how many test where not 100% right and what the average is. Attached is a patch to add that. ****** ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ****** Disclaimer on file. | ||
Comments: | By: Clod Patry (junky) 2005-03-02 20:40:18.000-0600 100% is kinda hard to maintain. what about display stat with lowest, higher, average? maybe range could be interesting too. If you could do patches for HEAD, it would be great, that's the version for "changes". By: Mark Spencer (markster) 2005-03-02 22:31:56.000-0600 100% is not reasonable to expect. I agree, and as soon as you put that people will bug tech support asking why it isn't 100%. By: Clod Patry (junky) 2005-03-03 20:17:56.000-0600 with that patch (rev1), you will obtain infos like: I think it's the more we can push that, without having the tech support of digium with a TONS of questions. example: debian:/usr/src/zaptel# ./zttest Opened pseudo zap interface, measuring accuracy... 99.963379% 99.975586% 99.975586% --- Results after 3 passes --- Best: 99.975586 -- Worst: 99.963379 -- Average: 99.971517 debian:/usr/src/zaptel# (Disclaimer on file). edited on: 03-03-05 20:58 By: Matt O'Gorman (mogorman) 2005-03-17 07:38:25.000-0600 code is disclaimed, and customers who wouldnt understand why its not 100% dont run zttest... lets put it in the source By: Clod Patry (junky) 2005-03-28 03:00:01.000-0600 I just though the average is a good think to know (if run on a couple of hours). If there's no need for an average, feel free to close that bug. By: Mark Spencer (markster) 2005-03-28 23:31:24.000-0600 Added to CVS, thanks! By: Russell Bryant (russell) 2005-04-04 02:37:57 not included in 1.0 By: Digium Subversion (svnbot) 2008-06-07 10:50:17 Repository: dahdi Revision: 609 U trunk/zttest.c ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r609 | markster | 2008-06-07 10:50:16 -0500 (Sat, 07 Jun 2008) | 2 lines Improve zttest (bug ASTERISK-3621) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ http://svn.digium.com/view/dahdi?view=rev&revision=609 |