Summary: | ASTERISK-03584: Realtime updates | ||
Reporter: | constfilin (constfilin) | Labels: | |
Date Opened: | 2005-02-25 00:23:05.000-0600 | Date Closed: | 2011-06-07 14:05:18 |
Priority: | Major | Regression? | No |
Status: | Closed/Complete | Components: | Channels/chan_sip/DatabaseSupport |
Versions: | Frequency of Occurrence | ||
Related Issues: | |||
Environment: | Attachments: | ||
Description: | Greetings I have a situation where in /etc/asterisk/extconfig.conf there is <EXTCONFIG> [settings] ... sippeers=odbc,database,asterisk_sip_friends ... </EXTCONFIG> asterisk_sip_friends is a view on several joined tables. Everything is fine until in function realtime_update_peer I have to update the peer. Views can't be updated (duh!) I see 2 ways to fix it: 1. Add modifications to chan_sip.c so that realtime_update_peer uses another realtime table (e.g. "sippeers_for_update") and have in /etc/asterisk/extconfig.conf something like <EXTCONFIG> [settings] ... sippeers_for_update=odbc,database,my_table_name ... </EXTCONFIG> OR 2. Have a more generic solution where /usr/src/asterisk/config.c function "ast_update_realtime" first calls find_engine with the first argument family+"_for_update" and if the engine is not found then defaults to the current code. I'd appreciate your comments on which route is the best to fix the problem. I'd like to migrate to asterisk realtime engine completely from my properietary solution and this is the last obstacle I have to overcome. | ||
Comments: | By: Kevin P. Fleming (kpfleming) 2005-02-25 06:41:22.000-0600 This is an interesting problem. There are databases with updatable views, but they are not common. There are also databases with "instead of" triggers on views that can send the updates elsewhere, but again they are not common. I think your second solution is more palatable; keep it in the realtime code itself, not in the users of that code. By: Brian West (bkw918) 2005-02-25 10:32:45.000-0600 Yet another reaons we use MSSQL. You can update views. /b By: constfilin (constfilin) 2005-02-25 13:04:06.000-0600 MSSQL can only update *some* very limited set of views I am running a postgres database and postgres supports rules for updating views (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/interactive/rules-update.html). Still, to have a generic solution would be nice. Any ideas? By: constfilin (constfilin) 2005-02-25 13:31:44.000-0600 Bugmarshals, please close this issue - I figured out how to apply postgres system of rules to do the UPDATEs on views. Or, you can keep this bug open if you think this is important. By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2005-03-10 23:55:37.000-0600 Closing bug on reporter's request. |