| Summary: | ASTERISK-03557: Square brackets in pattern matching produces pbx_config : out of stack | ||
| Reporter: | al3x (al3x) | Labels: | |
| Date Opened: | 2005-02-22 02:23:01.000-0600 | Date Closed: | 2011-06-07 14:10:03 |
| Priority: | Minor | Regression? | No |
| Status: | Closed/Complete | Components: | Core/General |
| Versions: | Frequency of Occurrence | ||
| Related Issues: | |||
| Environment: | Attachments: | ||
| Description: | I have blocks of extensions 0103-0112,0113-0139 which I have to forward. Constructions like exten => _010[3456789],Transfer(0101) or exten => _011[13-9],Goto(myiax,0101,1) exten => _012[0-9],Goto(myiax,0101,1) exten => _013[0-9],Goto(myiax,0101,1) produces following warnings (and doesn't work) Feb 22 00:06:16 WARNING[4956]: pbx.c:715 pbx_find_extension: Maximum PBX stack exceeded I don't really see anything offending in the patterns. | ||
| Comments: | By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2005-02-22 07:43:57.000-0600 You have no priority set. By: al3x (al3x) 2005-02-22 08:57:25.000-0600 /me very ashamead of making fool of himself - that what happens when you are changing dial plan in a hurry at 3 am - please close this. Speaking of priorities though I was wondering why asterisk core system is so unforgiving - why can't I have non-cosecutive numbering of priorities? Wouldn't it make configuration much easier if it will be possible to comment some priorities out w/o breaking the extension configuration? Something like 2,3,4,102 or even 1,3,5,102 should make the same sense as strict consecutive prio numbering starting from 1. By: Kevin P. Fleming (kpfleming) 2005-02-22 09:02:42.000-0600 In CVS HEAD there are already ways to label and auto-number priorities, which allow for the effects you are asking for. | ||