| Summary: | ASTERISK-02758: Change HOSTCC to CC | ||
| Reporter: | nix (nix) | Labels: | |
| Date Opened: | 2004-11-07 19:13:32.000-0600 | Date Closed: | 2011-06-07 14:10:26 |
| Priority: | Minor | Regression? | No |
| Status: | Closed/Complete | Components: | Core/General |
| Versions: | Frequency of Occurrence | ||
| Related Issues: | |||
| Environment: | Attachments: | ( 0) zaptel-hostcc_cc.patch | |
| Description: | Change HOSTCC to CC so that the zaptel Makefile bahaves the same way as the rest of the unix world. This allows default instalations of ccache and distcc to function properly with zaptel. | ||
| Comments: | By: Mark Spencer (markster) 2004-11-07 19:19:54.000-0600 Do you have a disclaimer on file? Also, you notice that the Linux kernel Makefile also uses HOSTCC because some things have to be compiled/executed on the host machine and are not compiled on the target (e.g. gendigits and makefw) so your patch should be sure to retain HOSTCC for the compilation of those two tools. By: nix (nix) 2004-11-08 02:32:10.000-0600 I have had a disclaimer on file with Digium for 9 months or so. Can I suggest a checkbox be added to the bugtracker requesting this info, instead of the first bugnote in every post asking if people have their disclaimer on file... I will check though the patch for the things that need to be locally compiled and resubmit later in the day. Thanks for the headup. By: Mark Spencer (markster) 2004-11-08 09:54:42.000-0600 Most people just add a mention of it when they place their bug report. In fact you get an extra karma point for doing so. Having someone actually type it rather than simply check a checkbox provides a bit more evidence that they really did submit it and know what they're doing :) By: Mark Spencer (markster) 2004-11-14 18:40:54.000-0600 Any update here? By: Mark Spencer (markster) 2004-11-22 16:11:58.000-0600 Bug placer seems to have lost interest in updating the patch. | ||