Summary: | ASTERISK-02486: [request] priority of same and next in extensions.conf | ||
Reporter: | revk (revk) | Labels: | |
Date Opened: | 2004-09-27 14:17:41 | Date Closed: | 2004-10-02 21:16:12 |
Priority: | Major | Regression? | No |
Status: | Closed/Complete | Components: | Core/Configuration |
Versions: | Frequency of Occurrence | ||
Related Issues: | |||
Environment: | Attachments: | ||
Description: | I often need a long sequence of commands in extension.conf, and as ever I come along later an need to insert one. A simple way to handle this would be for the parser to handle a priority of "same" and "next" to mean the same as the previous line or the previous line's priority plus one. At the start of a context same and next should both work out as 1 (or perhaps "same" is just stupid there and should be 0). ****** ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ****** Currently using CVS-HEAD-09/27/04-19:15:14 | ||
Comments: | By: Mark Spencer (markster) 2004-09-27 14:24:11 When would "same" ever be used? By: revk (revk) 2004-09-27 14:33:51 To clarify - this suggestion is ONLY a parsing change, not any change to internal data structures. By: revk (revk) 2004-09-27 14:35:30 same would be used where you want, e.g. exten = _./100,next,SetCallerID(fred) exten = _./101,same,SetCallerID(jim) exten = _.,same,NoOp ; Other caller IDs not changed exten = _.,next,Dial(zap/g1/${EXTEN}) Ie.. some times there are several different choices at the same priority. By: Mark Spencer (markster) 2004-10-02 16:41:04 Added to CVS, also used "s" and "n" as shortcuts. By: Russell Bryant (russell) 2004-10-02 21:16:12 not included in the 1.0 branch - feature |