[Home]

Summary:ASTERISK-02117: [patch] Fail to get redirecting number
Reporter:rluque (rluque)Labels:
Date Opened:2004-07-27 02:04:24Date Closed:2004-09-25 02:09:42
Priority:MajorRegression?No
Status:Closed/CompleteComponents:Core/General
Versions:Frequency of
Occurrence
Related
Issues:
Environment:Attachments:( 0) q931.c.diff
( 1) q931.c.patch
( 2) q931.c.patch
Description:When you extract redirecting number from ISDN Information Element, sometimes fails if previous fields are not present.

****** ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ******

In order to solve this bug, you should check every field before redirecting number field.
Comments:By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2004-07-27 04:31:14

* Always attach patch in a .txt file, not within the bug report
* When coding, follow the coding guidelines (doc/CODING-GUIDELINES in your
 source directory
* Please follow report guidelines on http://www.digium.com/bugtracker.html

We are missing the following info:
-- System you are using?
-- Version of asterisk, zaptel, libpri

edited on: 07-27-04 04:15

By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2004-07-27 04:32:32

Also, please confirm that you've sent in a disclaimer accoring to the guidelines. Thank you for contributing to Asterisk!

/O

By: rluque (rluque) 2004-07-28 03:21:13

I'm sorry, I will follow your advice next time:

System configuration:
Dell PowerEdge 700 P4-3.2, 1Gb, 80Gb SATA.
Debian Sarge, kernel 2.6.5
Telephony hardware Junghanns QuadBRI ISDN card.
asterisk, libpri, zaptel: lastest CVS (2004/07/23)
q931.c : CVS v. 1.83

By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2004-08-08 15:34:22

Does this patch still work with current CVS head?

By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2004-08-08 15:35:09

Dislaimer sent?

By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2004-08-14 13:14:15

We need an update on the disclaimer. Without a disclaimer, the patch will not move forward. if you have any questions, find a bug marshal on the irc channel.

By: Brian West (bkw918) 2004-08-22 23:08:42

Can we get an update here?  We are pushing for 1.0 we need faster turn around for bugs reported.

Thanks,
Brian

By: Paul Cadach (pcadach) 2004-08-23 22:19:19

I have a disclaimer, patch is updated to follow my "strategy" to be compliant with Q.931 clause 4.5.1.

By: Brian West (bkw918) 2004-08-24 10:54:21

YAY :) Thanks

By: Paul Cadach (pcadach) 2004-08-24 12:34:20

Sorry, forget close paren after switch() statement... Could it be added manually to not re-generate diff-file?

By: Mark Spencer (markster) 2004-08-25 01:21:04

Fixed in CVS