| Summary: | ASTERISK-02037: [patch] 7960 rejecting from field with :0 port description | ||
| Reporter: | Terry Wilson (twilson) | Labels: | |
| Date Opened: | 2004-07-16 13:30:08 | Date Closed: | 2011-06-07 14:10:16 |
| Priority: | Minor | Regression? | No |
| Status: | Closed/Complete | Components: | Core/General |
| Versions: | Frequency of Occurrence | ||
| Related Issues: | |||
| Environment: | Attachments: | ( 0) bad_from.txt ( 1) chan_sip.c.patch | |
| Description: | When getting an incoming call off of a Zap channel and transmitting it as SIP to a Cisco 7960 phone that is registered to an SER proxy (which is record-routing), the 7960 is rejecting the call with a "400 Bad Request" error. The message header shows "399 - Bad Request Malformed/Missing FROM: field". ****** ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ****** Attatched are the INVITE and 400 response packets that were captured on the SER proxy. You'll notice that the From: field on the invite shows: From: "5555551212" <sip:5555551212@XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:0>;tag=as179a9554 Obviously, if a call comes off of a ZAP channel it won't have a TCP port number. Apparently, the Cisco 7960 (firmware 7.1 SIP) doesn't like the ':0' in the from field. I have tested it with other SIP endpoints that worked fine with the ':0'. Attached is a patch that changes the checks for default port (or 5060) in chan_sip.c to checks for port 5060 and not 0. It seems to work without any adverse effects on my systems. | ||
| Comments: | By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2004-07-16 13:38:11 Could you please add your sip.conf [general] section? By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2004-07-16 13:38:44 Also, are you running the latest cvs head? By: Terry Wilson (twilson) 2004-07-16 13:39:58 Sorry, I meant to add: XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX == asterisk-pstn gateway YYY.YYY.YYY.YYY == Cisco 7960 phone ZZZ.ZZZ.ZZZ.ZZZ == SER Proxy There are actually two INVITES and two BAD REQUESTS (since we are using the proxy in the middle), but I figured the two I captured should be sufficient to describe the problem. Hope this helps. By: Terry Wilson (twilson) 2004-07-16 14:10:53 Ahh... good call. Using res_config and aparently forgot to export general section over to the test server... :-) I guess that port= line is important then? :-) Ah well, my patch at least fixes an issue for people like more who aren't too bright! Fixed general section and reverted from patch and all works fine. By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2004-07-16 14:14:43 COnfiguration issue. Thank you for quick responses! /O | ||