Summary: | ASTERISK-01800: [patch] pulse dialing for chan_zap | ||
Reporter: | gonzo gonzo (gonzo) | Labels: | |
Date Opened: | 2004-06-11 13:06:19 | Date Closed: | 2004-09-25 02:04:40 |
Priority: | Major | Regression? | No |
Status: | Closed/Complete | Components: | Core/General |
Versions: | Frequency of Occurrence | ||
Related Issues: | |||
Environment: | Attachments: | ( 0) pulse.asterisk.diff ( 1) pulse.asterisk.Naur.patch ( 2) pulse.asterisk.unified.diff ( 3) pulse.zaptel.diff ( 4) pulse.zaptel.Naur.patch ( 5) pulse.zaptel.unified.diff ( 6) pulsepatchcvs.txt | |
Description: | Patch that enables pulse dialing for Zaptel channels. ****** ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ****** More information about patch and new parameters could be obtained from http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+zaptel+pulse+dialing | ||
Comments: | By: Mark Spencer (markster) 2004-06-12 09:08:10 Hrm... It strikes me that pulse dialing should be inside zaptel. The problem I have with this patch is that it's a "bad idea" to block for any substantial amount of time, and dialing a "0" would definitely block for a long time. By: gonzo gonzo (gonzo) 2004-06-25 11:09:30 pulse.*.diff files implement pulse dialing using in-kernel timers and should not block during number dialing. By: Mark Spencer (markster) 2004-06-25 11:09:56 Looking good, please attach in diff -u format, thanks! By: gonzo gonzo (gonzo) 2004-06-25 12:21:04 Sorry, missed "developers guidelines". Last two patches - should be fine. By: twisted (twisted) 2004-07-23 20:33:09 is this still of any interest? By: Mark Spencer (markster) 2004-07-23 23:41:10 I like the asterisk portion, but the zaptel portion seems to complex and adds too many fields. I'd like to think this can be done more simply but i could be proven wrong. By: Mark Spencer (markster) 2004-07-29 19:01:09 Yes, this is about *sending* pulse dialing out an FXO not receiving it on an FXS By: Brian West (bkw918) 2004-08-22 23:04:50 Updates? get your fresh updates? Is this up to date for the latest CVS? Have you talked to mark to see if this could be done diffrently? bkw By: Mark Spencer (markster) 2004-09-13 19:07:04 Merged the asterisk portion, the zaptel portion having been implemented by Jim Dixon. |