Summary:ASTERISK-01800: [patch] pulse dialing for chan_zap
Reporter:gonzo gonzo (gonzo)Labels:
Date Opened:2004-06-11 13:06:19Date Closed:2004-09-25 02:04:40
Versions:Frequency of
Environment:Attachments:( 0) pulse.asterisk.diff
( 1) pulse.asterisk.Naur.patch
( 2) pulse.asterisk.unified.diff
( 3) pulse.zaptel.diff
( 4) pulse.zaptel.Naur.patch
( 5) pulse.zaptel.unified.diff
( 6) pulsepatchcvs.txt
Description:Patch that enables pulse dialing for Zaptel channels.


More information about patch and new parameters could be obtained from  http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+zaptel+pulse+dialing
Comments:By: Mark Spencer (markster) 2004-06-12 09:08:10

Hrm...  It strikes me that pulse dialing should be inside zaptel.  The problem I have with this patch is that it's a "bad idea" to block for any substantial amount of time, and dialing a "0" would definitely block for a long time.

By: gonzo gonzo (gonzo) 2004-06-25 11:09:30

pulse.*.diff files implement pulse dialing using in-kernel timers and should not block during
number dialing.

By: Mark Spencer (markster) 2004-06-25 11:09:56

Looking good, please attach in diff -u format, thanks!

By: gonzo gonzo (gonzo) 2004-06-25 12:21:04

Sorry, missed "developers guidelines". Last two patches - should be fine.

By: twisted (twisted) 2004-07-23 20:33:09

is this still of any interest?

By: Mark Spencer (markster) 2004-07-23 23:41:10

I like the asterisk portion, but the zaptel portion seems to complex and adds too many fields.  I'd like to think this can be done more simply but i could be proven wrong.

By: Mark Spencer (markster) 2004-07-29 19:01:09

Yes, this is about *sending* pulse dialing out an FXO not receiving it on an FXS

By: Brian West (bkw918) 2004-08-22 23:04:50

Updates? get your fresh updates?

Is this up to date for the latest CVS?  Have you talked to mark to see if this could be done diffrently?


By: Mark Spencer (markster) 2004-09-13 19:07:04

Merged the asterisk portion, the zaptel portion having been implemented by Jim Dixon.