|Summary:||ASTERISK-01800: [patch] pulse dialing for chan_zap|
|Reporter:||gonzo gonzo (gonzo)||Labels:|
|Date Opened:||2004-06-11 13:06:19||Date Closed:||2004-09-25 02:04:40|
|Environment:||Attachments:||( 0) pulse.asterisk.diff|
( 1) pulse.asterisk.Naur.patch
( 2) pulse.asterisk.unified.diff
( 3) pulse.zaptel.diff
( 4) pulse.zaptel.Naur.patch
( 5) pulse.zaptel.unified.diff
( 6) pulsepatchcvs.txt
|Description:||Patch that enables pulse dialing for Zaptel channels.|
****** ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ******
More information about patch and new parameters could be obtained from http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+zaptel+pulse+dialing
|Comments:||By: Mark Spencer (markster) 2004-06-12 09:08:10|
Hrm... It strikes me that pulse dialing should be inside zaptel. The problem I have with this patch is that it's a "bad idea" to block for any substantial amount of time, and dialing a "0" would definitely block for a long time.
By: gonzo gonzo (gonzo) 2004-06-25 11:09:30
pulse.*.diff files implement pulse dialing using in-kernel timers and should not block during
By: Mark Spencer (markster) 2004-06-25 11:09:56
Looking good, please attach in diff -u format, thanks!
By: gonzo gonzo (gonzo) 2004-06-25 12:21:04
Sorry, missed "developers guidelines". Last two patches - should be fine.
By: twisted (twisted) 2004-07-23 20:33:09
is this still of any interest?
By: Mark Spencer (markster) 2004-07-23 23:41:10
I like the asterisk portion, but the zaptel portion seems to complex and adds too many fields. I'd like to think this can be done more simply but i could be proven wrong.
By: Mark Spencer (markster) 2004-07-29 19:01:09
Yes, this is about *sending* pulse dialing out an FXO not receiving it on an FXS
By: Brian West (bkw918) 2004-08-22 23:04:50
Updates? get your fresh updates?
Is this up to date for the latest CVS? Have you talked to mark to see if this could be done diffrently?
By: Mark Spencer (markster) 2004-09-13 19:07:04
Merged the asterisk portion, the zaptel portion having been implemented by Jim Dixon.