| Summary: | ASTERISK-01382: Compile of wcfxs.c (CVS version 1.45) fails with gcc 2.95.4 20011002 (Debian prerelease) | ||
| Reporter: | robf (robf) | Labels: | |
| Date Opened: | 2004-04-09 12:16:51 | Date Closed: | 2004-09-25 02:52:13 |
| Priority: | Major | Regression? | No |
| Status: | Closed/Complete | Components: | Core/General |
| Versions: | Frequency of Occurrence | ||
| Related Issues: | |||
| Environment: | Attachments: | ||
| Description: | gcc -I/usr/src/linux-2.4/include -O6 -DMODULE -D__KERNEL__ -DEXPORT_SYMTAB -I/usr/src/linux/drivers/net -Wall -I. -Wstrict-prototypes -fomit-frame-pointer -I/usr/src/linux/drivers/net/wan -I /usr/src/linux/include -I/usr/src/linux/include/net -DMODVERSIONS -include /usr/src/linux/include/linux/modversions.h -DSTANDALONE_ZAPATA -c wcfxs.c wcfxs.c:197: warning: unnamed struct/union that defines no instances wcfxs.c: In function `wcfxs_interrupt': wcfxs.c:650: structure has no member named `fxs' wcfxs.c:652: structure has no member named `fxs' wcfxs.c:653: structure has no member named `fxs' <snip> | ||
| Comments: | By: zoa (zoa) 2004-04-09 12:48:20 i can confirm this. just tested it. By: Mark Spencer (markster) 2004-04-09 13:06:43 Your compiler does not appear to properly support anonymous unions in the definition of a struct. Google does not seem to confirm if this is legal or not, so I guess i'm going to have to err on the side of compatibility, even at the expense of readability. By: Mark Spencer (markster) 2004-04-09 13:07:28 Fixed (if you can call it that) in CVS. | ||