Summary: | ASTERISK-01348: [patch] Improve debug output. Add a bit more info. | ||
Reporter: | jcdutton (jcdutton) | Labels: | |
Date Opened: | 2004-04-05 19:26:05 | Date Closed: | 2004-09-25 02:51:28 |
Priority: | Major | Regression? | No |
Status: | Closed/Complete | Components: | Core/General |
Versions: | Frequency of Occurrence | ||
Related Issues: | |||
Environment: | Attachments: | ( 0) libpri.diff | |
Description: | Small patch to improve debug output. | ||
Comments: | By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2004-04-11 09:32:03 jcdutton: Is this disclaimed? By: jcdutton (jcdutton) 2004-04-11 12:01:23 I did not know that anything needed disclaiming. As I now understand that this needs disclaiming, I guess you can't use it. By: zoa (zoa) 2004-04-11 12:37:50 huh ? you are kidding, right ? edited on: 04-11-04 12:18 By: James Golovich (jamesgolovich) 2004-04-11 22:12:08 Can not apply patch, no disclaimer. By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2004-04-12 03:29:25 jcdutton: I just need to check if you're fully aware of what the disclaimer means? I don't want to see code that we need get thrown away because of a misunderstanding. Please contact a bug marshal on the IRC so we can discuss this. If you are fully aware of what the Digium disclaimer means and have made a 'no way' decision, please confirm this once again so we know for a fact that you don't want to disclaim this patch. Sorry if I'm a pest that will not give up. I just want to be 100% sure that your answer wasn't a misunderstanding of the disclaimer we use for Asterisk source. The disclaimer can be found on the front page of http://bugs.digium.com By: jcdutton (jcdutton) 2004-04-12 07:54:55 This disclaimer is so unfair I am astounded that anyone has signed it. The bullying I have received, trying to get me to sign this, is disgusting in my view. By: Olle Johansson (oej) 2004-04-12 11:01:27 Ok, that was a clear message. Bug resolved, finally. |