Summary:ASTERISK-01303: zttool show incorrect call counts
Reporter:scaredycat (scaredycat)Labels:
Date Opened:2004-03-27 10:02:38.000-0600Date Closed:2011-06-07 14:10:24
Versions:Frequency of
Description:With a 410P card (set as E1's) zttool always shows Act: as 0 even when calls are in progress. Configured and total values are correct..

This is another one of those things that other people may or may not find important, but inaccurate information makes it pure hell to develop any real asterisk monitoring applications...
Comments:By: James Golovich (jamesgolovich) 2004-03-28 00:59:13.000-0600

zttool just uses the zt_param rxisoffhook var.  So if anything the problem is probably in the zaptel module.  If I get a chance I'll dig into the code

By: James Golovich (jamesgolovich) 2004-03-31 02:17:10.000-0600

Ok, It has to be something in the wct4xxp driver.  My T400P works as expected.

By: scaredycat (scaredycat) 2004-03-31 07:38:55.000-0600

My TDM20B works fine too...

By: twisted (twisted) 2004-04-03 00:45:57.000-0600

There have been a few changes in the wct4xxp driver...  Is this still an issue?

By: scaredycat (scaredycat) 2004-04-04 16:26:40

I've just updated from CVS on my home system (to test http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000544 ) and now X100P counts are wrong (always 0) TDM20B is still ok.

I haven't tried on our main servers as yet.. (this coming week).

By: Mark Spencer (markster) 2004-04-05 10:02:20

It won't work with PRI.  The call counts are based on RBS only.  Clear channel signalling systems like PRI don't keep track of that sort of information.

By: James Golovich (jamesgolovich) 2004-04-05 14:06:56

Oh, I didn't really think of it.  So should we close this out as not a bug, or come up with a different way to count active channels?

By: Brian West (bkw918) 2004-04-06 00:03:38

I agree not a bug.  :)

By: scaredycat (scaredycat) 2004-04-07 12:00:41

Can one of the bug marshals reassign this as a feature request then, ie fix zttool so that it can report properly for PRIs ...

By: Mark Spencer (markster) 2004-04-07 12:10:44

It is not possible with PRI or any other non-RBS signalling system, period.