| Summary: | ASTERISK-00944: PRI Cause: No user responding (18) not handled in chan_zap.c | ||
| Reporter: | thansen (thansen) | Labels: | |
| Date Opened: | 2004-01-29 10:10:31.000-0600 | Date Closed: | 2011-06-07 14:10:30 |
| Priority: | Minor | Regression? | No |
| Status: | Closed/Complete | Components: | Core/General |
| Versions: | Frequency of Occurrence | ||
| Related Issues: | |||
| Environment: | Attachments: | ||
| Description: | I believe "No user responding (18)" (PRI_CAUSE_NO_USER_RESPONSE) should be AST_CAUSE_BUSY and not default to AST_CAUSE_FAILURE as it is now in chan_zap.c. I get this cause when dialing a number which is answered by a Siemens PBX connected via two ISDN2s to a telco. The number does work, but it is not routed internally in the PBX which is why it doesn't get a response from an endpoint. Is cause 18 deliberately meant to be AST_CAUSE_FAILURE? I use the AST_CAUSE_FAILURE to give a special info tone, so the user know they've dialled an invalid/non-existing number. ****** ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ****** asterisk/channels/chan_zap.c:546:hangup_pri2cause | ||
| Comments: | By: Mark Spencer (markster) 2004-01-31 13:56:56.000-0600 This is not a bug, but it *is* improperly documented. | ||