[Home]

Summary:ASTERISK-00054: soft hangups on SIP channels seem to crash asterisk
Reporter:John Todd (jtodd)Labels:
Date Opened:2003-08-06 15:36:04Date Closed:2004-09-25 02:40:14
Priority:CriticalRegression?No
Status:Closed/CompleteComponents:Core/General
Versions:Frequency of
Occurrence
Related
Issues:
Environment:Attachments:
Description:I had an instance where several SIP channels got "stuck" and were not hanging up.  So, I ran "soft hangup <channelname>" and there were unexpected results.  The channels did not seem to hang up, and further CLI interactions did not function.  I had to re-start Asterisk by killing off the process ID manually.  

****** ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ******

gw3*CLI> show channels
       Channel  (Context    Extension    Pri )   State Appl.         Data          
SIP/remotesip-896d  (remotesip  17035551212  2   )      Up (None)        (None)        
SIP/remotesip-78e8  (remotesip  17035551212  2   )      Up (None)        (None)        
SIP/remotesip-8d62  (remotesip  17035551212  2   )      Up (None)        (None)        
SIP/remotesip-7797  (remotesip  17035551212  2   )      Up (None)        (None)        
4 active channel(s)
gw3*CLI>
gw3*CLI>
gw3*CLI>
gw3*CLI> soft hangup
SIP/remotesip-7797  SIP/remotesip-78e8  SIP/remotesip-896d  SIP/remotesip-8d62                      
gw3*CLI> soft hangup SIP/remotesip-896d
Requested Hangup on channel 'SIP/remotesip-896d'
gw3*CLI>
gw3*CLI>
gw3*CLI> show chanels
gw3*CLI> show channels
gw3*CLI> this line should produce an error, but it does not
gw3*CLI>
Comments:By: Mark Spencer (markster) 2003-08-13 18:50:17

Can you duplicate this problem?  Might need to ssh in and look for a deadlock.

By: John Todd (jtodd) 2003-08-14 15:43:37

I have not been able to duplicate this problem since upgrading my system (new code was only a few days newer than the code that showed these symptoms.)   I will have to say that this is "unreproducable" at the moment, but if it appears again I will open a different bug but reference this one.  Go ahead and close this out, I suppose.

By: Mark Spencer (markster) 2003-08-14 15:53:51

Probably has been fixed in CVS to the degree it might ever have existed at all.